Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2012
10

Low-paid workers 'are missing out on pension provision'

Open-access content Wednesday 31st October 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Low-paid workers are far less likely to have a workplace pension and those that do have far lower employer contribution rates, according to the Trades Union Congress.


31 OCT 2012 | THE ACTUARY NEWSDESK: NICK MANN

In its Pensions scorecard report, published today, the TUC found that workers earning over £300 a week were twice as likely to be paying into a workplace pension as those earning less than that amount.  

Just 14% of men and 24% of women earning under £300 a week were members of a pension scheme last year, compared to 32% and 49% respectively among those earning between £300-400 a week. This rises to 74% for men and 82% for women among those earning over £600 a week.

Those low-paid workers who do save into a workplace pension are also likely to have lower combined employer and employee contribution rates than better-paid workers. Nearly half (48%) of those earning under £200 a week have a monthly contribution rate of less than 8% for their defined contribution scheme, compared to just 23% of those earning over £500 a week.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: 'It is shocking that fewer than one in four people earning less than £300 a week are saving into a workplace pension scheme.

'Even those low-paid workers who are saving are more likely to have low employer and employee contribution rates that make it far harder to build an adequate pension pot when they retire.'

The TUC expects auto-enrolment to improve the take-up of workplace pensions among low-paid private sector workers, as well as improving contribution rates.

But it said more should be done to address the 2.1 million people who will have no legal right to access a workplace pension. As of next year, it estimates a further 1.9 million people could have to actively opt into a workplace pension rather than be auto-enrolled. The majority of these people are women and part-time workers, who the TUC said should be the focus of auto-enrolment.

It also raised concerns over the quality of contract-based pension schemes, which are increasingly being used ahead of trust-based schemes - a trend the TUC expects to continue as auto-enrolment kicks in.

According to the TUC, these schemes have poor governance structures because they are established by contracts between individuals and providers - usually insurance companies - rather than being run by boards of trustees. They also largely fall outside the remit of The Pension Regulator.

It also has concerns over contributions to contract-based schemes being lower than for other type of workplace pension schemes, and the potential for conflicts of interests between scheme members and the shareholders of pension providers.

Barber added: 'There are still too many low quality and poorly governed schemes around which need to be policed more effectively. Further reforms are needed if we are to make more DC schemes fit to provide a decent income in retirement.'

In particular, the TUC advocated the abolition of the cap on contributions to the National Employment Savings Trust - the trust-based pension scheme that has been set up by the government for employers to use for auto-enrolment. The Pensions Regulator should also be given more power to police the governance of contract-based schemes, it said.

This article appeared in our October 2012 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

Impact of QE on pension funds 'has been exaggerated'

The overall impact of quantitative easing on UK pension funds has been exaggerated and should not be used as an excuse for schemes not to de-risk, Towers Watson said yesterday.
Tuesday 30th October 2012
Open-access content
2

Two-tier charging system 'could harm auto-enrolment'

Penalising non-active members of pension schemes by using a two-tier charging system to benefit active scheme members could ‘endanger’ the success of auto-enrolment, Legal & General said yesterday.
Friday 26th October 2012
Open-access content
2

Guarantees for pensions could work, says the Profession

Providing guaranteed retirement income from a defined contribution pension could work, according to the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.
Wednesday 24th October 2012
Open-access content

'Fewer than one in five' face 20% income drop when they retire

Peoples’ ability to fund their retirement from sources other than the state pension and their workplace pension savings means only one in five can expect their income to fall by more than 20% when they stop working, an economic think-tank said today.
Tuesday 23rd October 2012
Open-access content

Gender gap for pensions 'reaches record high'

The gender gap in retirement saving has increased to a record high with women now saving an average of £776 per year less than men for use in old age, Scottish Widows said today.
Monday 22nd October 2012
Open-access content
2

Small firms unprepared for auto-enrolment, say consulting actuaries

Most small- and medium-sized companies are unprepared for the cost and complexity of pensions auto-enrolment and unclear about what it will require of them, the Association of Consulting Actuaries has said.
Monday 15th October 2012
Open-access content
Filed in
10
Topics
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Reserving Analyst

London (City of)
Negotiable
Reference
149485

Senior GI Modeler - Capital and Planning

London (Central)
£ excellent
Reference
149436

Risk Oversight Manager

Flexible / hybrid with a minimum of 2 days per week office-based
£ excellent
Reference
149435
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ