Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2012
10

Low-paid workers 'are missing out on pension provision'

Open-access content Wednesday 31st October 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Low-paid workers are far less likely to have a workplace pension and those that do have far lower employer contribution rates, according to the Trades Union Congress.


31 OCT 2012 | THE ACTUARY NEWSDESK: NICK MANN

In its Pensions scorecard report, published today, the TUC found that workers earning over £300 a week were twice as likely to be paying into a workplace pension as those earning less than that amount.  

Just 14% of men and 24% of women earning under £300 a week were members of a pension scheme last year, compared to 32% and 49% respectively among those earning between £300-400 a week. This rises to 74% for men and 82% for women among those earning over £600 a week.

Those low-paid workers who do save into a workplace pension are also likely to have lower combined employer and employee contribution rates than better-paid workers. Nearly half (48%) of those earning under £200 a week have a monthly contribution rate of less than 8% for their defined contribution scheme, compared to just 23% of those earning over £500 a week.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: 'It is shocking that fewer than one in four people earning less than £300 a week are saving into a workplace pension scheme.

'Even those low-paid workers who are saving are more likely to have low employer and employee contribution rates that make it far harder to build an adequate pension pot when they retire.'

The TUC expects auto-enrolment to improve the take-up of workplace pensions among low-paid private sector workers, as well as improving contribution rates.

But it said more should be done to address the 2.1 million people who will have no legal right to access a workplace pension. As of next year, it estimates a further 1.9 million people could have to actively opt into a workplace pension rather than be auto-enrolled. The majority of these people are women and part-time workers, who the TUC said should be the focus of auto-enrolment.

It also raised concerns over the quality of contract-based pension schemes, which are increasingly being used ahead of trust-based schemes - a trend the TUC expects to continue as auto-enrolment kicks in.

According to the TUC, these schemes have poor governance structures because they are established by contracts between individuals and providers - usually insurance companies - rather than being run by boards of trustees. They also largely fall outside the remit of The Pension Regulator.

It also has concerns over contributions to contract-based schemes being lower than for other type of workplace pension schemes, and the potential for conflicts of interests between scheme members and the shareholders of pension providers.

Barber added: 'There are still too many low quality and poorly governed schemes around which need to be policed more effectively. Further reforms are needed if we are to make more DC schemes fit to provide a decent income in retirement.'

In particular, the TUC advocated the abolition of the cap on contributions to the National Employment Savings Trust - the trust-based pension scheme that has been set up by the government for employers to use for auto-enrolment. The Pensions Regulator should also be given more power to police the governance of contract-based schemes, it said.

This article appeared in our October 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
10
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pensions Actuarial Analyst

London, Midlands, Scotland
£Market Competitive
Reference
143788

Senior Manager/Director level roles - Life insurance

Stirling
Generous salary with excellent bonus and benefits
Reference
143787

Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£60-90K depending on experience
Reference
143786
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ