Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2012
10

Pensions Regulator 'striking right balance' on scheme funding

Open-access content 10th October 2012

The Pensions Regulator has said that three-quarters of pension schemes currently undertaking their funding valuations will be able to meet their funding requirements without significantly increasing their deficit recovery contributions.

The regulator today published analysis of how schemes were using the flexibilities in the regulatory system which it said showed it was 'striking the right balance' between protecting savers, protecting the Pension Protection Fund and keeping businesses solvent.

Its examination of schemes with valuations scheduled between September 2011 and September 2012 found that roughly one in four would not need to amend their current recovery plans which set out how they plan to close their deficits. A further 30% would be on track to meet their long-term liabilities with a three year extension to their existing recovery plan and a 10% increase in employer contributions.

Around one in five schemes could remain on track with a three year extension to their existing recovery plan, a 10% increase in contributions and making use of further flexibilities available to them, such as forecasting better investment performance in their recovery plan.

The regulator, did, however find that around 25% of schemes would need to make 'maximum use' of the flexibilities available to them in the regulator's framework because of the challenges employers faced in meeting their funding requirements.

Last week, TPR chair Michael O'Higgins said it would no longer increase scrutiny of schemes whose recovery plans were based on closing their deficits over a period of more than 10 years, as part of a move to give this 'significant minority' of schemes more regulatory breathing space.

Stephen Soper, the regulator's executive director of defined benefit regulation, today echoed these sentiments, acknowledging that some schemes were finding it 'extremely tough'.

'We're working proactively with schemes to understand how we find a way through these difficult cases,' he explained.

But, he added: 'We believe that the right balance is being struck, in our approach to the DB funding regime, between protecting retirement savers, protecting the PPF and maintaining employer viability'.

Today's analysis also highlighted the increasing amount of time schemes need to tackle their deficits, with 'tranche seven' schemes having, on average, increased their recovery plan length by 7.7 years since 2009.

Mel Duffield, head of research at the National Association of Pension Funds, said the regulator's evidence showed the 'intense pressure' pension funds were under at the moment.

'Record low gilt yields, driven down by quantitative easing and the UK's reputation as a "safe haven" for investors, are pushing up fund liabilities and leaving employers with big deficits to fill as a result,' she explained.

The regulator's conclusion that around 45% of schemes will have to use flexibilities in the funding regime showed these were 'exceptional times'.

Duffield added: 'The flexibility of the system is greatly valued by pension funds, but we do not think it is enough. There needs to be a wider rethink about how deficits are valued in relation to gilts.'

This article appeared in our October 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Topics:
Regulation Standards
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Reinsurance Pricing Lead

England, London
£40000 - £75000 per annum
Reference
118905

Senior Pricing Actuary

London, England
£60000 - £110000 per annum
Reference
118904

Pricing Actuary (Casualty)

England, London
£60000 - £80000 per annum
Reference
118903
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200