Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2012
06

FTSE 250 pension schemes 'in precarious position'

Open-access content Thursday 28th June 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

The total pensions deficit of the UK’s leading 250 companies increased from £5bn to £11bn last year, despite the injection of £1.5bn to close pensions deficits, according to figures published by JLT Pension Capital Strategies Limited today.

2

JLT's research also found that the total disclosed pension liabilities of the FTSE 250 rose from £67bn to £69bn over the course of 2011, with 18 companies disclosing liabilities in excess of £1bn.

Software manufacturer Invensys had the highest disclosed liabilities, of £5.452bn - equivalent to 320% of the company's equity market value and giving it a pension deficit of £428m.

Travel firm FirstGroup had the next biggest disclosed liabilities - £3.420bn - followed by insurance provider Phoenix Life (£2.995bn), engineering services company Babcock International (£2.795bn) and construction firm Balfour Beatty (£2.785bn).

Charles Cowling, managing director at JLT, said: 'This latest data further underlines the precarious situation most companies now find themselves embroiled in.

'Changes in economic conditions and increasing life expectancy have contributed to the spiralling growth in pension liabilities. Crucially, there are a significant number of FTSE 250 companies where the pension scheme represents a material risk to the business.'

The £1.5bn deficit funding seen last year represented an increase from £1.2bn in 2010, with Taylor Wimpey and Cable & Wireless making the biggest individual net deficit contributions of £122m and £101m respectively. Another 46 FTSE 250 companies also reported significant deficit funding contributions during the year, generally equal to over £10m of surplus funding each.

JLT also found a continued decline in defined benefit pension scheme provision by the FTSE 250, with only 75 companies still providing DB benefits to more than a handful of current employees and only 15 firms doing so for a significant number of their workers. The underlying reduction in open DB schemes is 10% over the past year.

Mr Cowling said the continued closure of DB schemes had failed to impact on rising deficits. 'This is why more and more trustees boards are moving towards a more risk-averse stance, protecting schemes from over-exposure to the stormy equity markets by buying corporate bonds in increasing numbers.

'However, there is still a demand for growth investments that will produce returns, whilst still mitigating risk, so schemes should be looking at diversified growth investments to plug deficits.'

The research found that the average FTSE 250 pension scheme allocation to bonds increased slightly last year - from 48% to 50%. JLT said this was part of a larger trend for firms to move away from equities as they look to de-risk their schemes. Bond allocation has increased by 8% over the last three years, and eight of the FTSE 250 have increased their asset allocation to bonds by more than 20%.

Mr Cowling added: 'This de-risking is coming at a significant cost, as evidenced by the fact that pension deficit funding is significantly up from the last quarter. Exposure to equities will continue to fall in favour of fixed income as schemes seek to de-risk. This move is important because of a significant minority of FTSE 250 schemes could be viewed as considerably jeopardised by the extent of their liabilities.'

This article appeared in our June 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
06
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Catastrophe Modelling Analyst - London Market Broker

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
145925

Senior Catastrophe Analyst

England, London
£65000 - £75000 per annum
Reference
145924

Life Actuary - Financial Reporting - Day Rate contract

Negotiable
Reference
145923
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ