Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2012
05

Takeovers and mergers 'major risk to scheme funding'

Open-access content Monday 14th May 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Corporate transactions such as company takeovers and mergers could pose a bigger risk to pension scheme funding than the potential default of their sponsor company, according to Gazelle Pensions Advisory.

2

The consultancy published research today which showed that, while 7% of companies listed on the FTSE 100 in 1985, had defaulted on pension payments, 26% of them had experienced a level of financial stress which was 'likely to have been materially detrimental to pension funding'.

In particular, its analysis of the companies' experience over the past 25 years found that the 'exceptionally high' incidence of corporate change represented the biggest risk to the employer covenant ­- a business's ability to fund its pension scheme.

Over eight out of ten (83%) of the companies covered by the research had experienced one or more major corporate transaction - 55% of these having been taken over, often by an overseas company. A further 40% had been through a demerger or restructuring and 33% had undergone a major merger.

Many companies had experienced more than one of these, Gazelle noted, with only 17 companies in the FTSE 100 index in 1985 not having been through any corporate transaction change.

According to Gazelle, while these transactions are part of a legitimate business strategy, they often cut across the legal structures and asset base pension schemes are attached to.

Pension schemes may also face funding difficulties through their attachment to older, mature or declining parts of a company's business. 'The attachment of pension schemes to historic participating employers may well over time "erode" covenant support by confining it to mature and declining businesses,' it said.

'New growing business units may, for many reasons, fall outside of the historic formal participating employer structure which is left to "wither on the vine".'

In light of this, it questioned the Pension Regulator's focus on schemes being formally attached to the existing participating employer.

The regulator should consider whether formal support for a scheme comes at parental company level and then passes through to any new successor group parent company resulting from corporate changes, Gazelle said.

Simon Willes, chair of Gazelle, said: 'It is not clear that the current pension regulatory framework which has striven to improve the protection of pension schemes on default, effectively deals with the risks to pension scheme funding posed by corporate activity and change.

'The transaction clearance regime originally showcased is voluntary and appears to be now largely ignored by companies and their advisers. If regulation is about ensuring pensioners do receive pensions from defined benefit schemes, then elevation of the status and ranking of pension schemes from long-term unsecured creditors is central to the debate.'

This article appeared in our May 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
05
Topics
Risk & ERM

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Deputy Head of Capital Modelling

London (Central)
£110000 - £130000 per annum
Reference
144789

Head of Analytics (Actuarial)

London (Central)
£130000 - £165000 per annum
Reference
144788

Pensions Actuarial Analyst - GMP Equalisation

London (Central)
£ dependent upon experience
Reference
143745
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ