Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • March 2012
03

Banks must raise more capital, says Bank of England

Open-access content Monday 26th March 2012 — updated 2.49pm, Tuesday 5th May 2020

The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee has called on banks to raise more capital to increase their resilience in a fragile financial environment.

Minutes published on Friday from the committee's meeting earlier this month reveal that, while banks had made 'some progress' in building capital levels since its previous meeting in November 2011, more needed to be done.

'The committee remained concerned that capital was not yet at levels that would ensure resilience in the face of prospective risks and noted that the ability to make further progress via greater restraint of cash distributions was limited,' they said. 'It therefore advised banks to raise external capital as early as feasible.'

The committee, which is chaired by Bank of England governor Mervyn King, currently exists in an interim form, but is set to be created as a statutory body later this year. It's monitoring role means it can pass on concerns about any economic risks it identifies to the Prudential Regulation Committee being established as part of the new 'twin peaks' system of financial regulation.

In the minutes from this month's meeting, the FPC also outlined the statutory powers it expects to be given in order to meet the systemic risks arising from excessive balance sheet leverage and fragile funding positions, excessively loose terms and conditions of lending and fragilities in market structures.

In particular, it called for control over the setting of the countercyclical capital bugger in the UK, sectoral capital requirements and a leverage ratio. These tools, the committee said, would 'provide control most directly over the balance sheets of a range of financial institutions'.

Speaking on Friday, FPC member Michael Cohrs said these tools were needed if the Bank was to do something 'meaningful' when it next determines 'systemic risk building dangerously within the financial system'

They were also needed if it wants to 'allow financial institutions in bad times to utilise a countercyclical capital buffer built up in good times'.

He told an event in Edinburgh that the move to a new system of financial regulation since the economic crisis was likely to be an improvement.

But, he added: 'We shouldn't be under any illusion that a change in the structure of regulation in itself will rule out another financial crisis or indeed that this new system will prevent the collapse of individual banks or other financial services companies.

'Ultimately it is the culture within individual banks and the incentive systems that drive risk taking which need to be changed.  The good news is that I see evidence that banks are changing incentive systems and this will lead to a different culture within the banks which society will prefer.'

Mr Cohrs said, however, that he did not want to see any end to risk-taking. 'Care must be taken to ensure that regulators don't go too far and stifle legitimate risk taking which creates value in the real economy.

'The wisdom of hindsight, from which we benefit in considering the 'light-touch' approach, will not be available to us to evaluate the post-crash regulatory mantra of "intensive and intrusive" for some time yet. But even at this early stage it seems clear that the correct balance needs to be struck.'

This article appeared in our March 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
03
Topics
Global

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pensions Actuarial Analyst

London, Midlands, Scotland
£Market Competitive
Reference
143788

Senior Manager/Director level roles - Life insurance

Stirling
Generous salary with excellent bonus and benefits
Reference
143787

Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£60-90K depending on experience
Reference
143786
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ