Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January 2011
01

Public pension reforms 'unlikely to save money in long-term'

Open-access content 31st January 2012

The government’s latest offer on public sector pension reform is unlikely to save money over the longer term, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.


31 JAN 2012 | THE ACTUARY NEWSDESK: NICK MANN
Carl Emmerson IFS

In an analysis published today, the economic think-tank said that any savings made by increasing pension ages would, on average, be offset by other elements of the pensions becoming more generous.

Under the final offer made to the trade unions by Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander late last year, the pension age for schemes would increase in line with the state pension age and schemes would change from final salary to career-average defined benefit.

In general, the proposed reforms will improve the structure of public sector pensions, the IFS said, while the move from Retail Price Index to Consumer Price Index indexation of pensions originally announced in October 2010 will 'substantially' reduce expected costs and generosity.

But, the latest proposed changes will result in lower earners in the public sector actually receiving a more generous pension when they retire at 65 than under current arrangements. According to the IFS, this results from the move from final salary to career average schemes and changes to accrual and indexation rules.

Conversely, it found that higher earners are likely to lose out. This is because the move from final salary to career average payouts relatively penalises those who see big increases in their earnings over time.

And, by increasing generosity to lower earners - a group less likely to have a good employer pension in the private sector - the reforms increase the difference between the public and private sectors, the think-tank said.

Carl Emmerson, deputy director of the IFAS and co-author of the research, said: 'The reforms to public service pensions implemented by the last Labour government, and this government's decision to switch from RPI to CPI indexation of pension benefits, will in the long run reduce the generosity and therefore the cost of these schemes to the taxpayer.

'But the consequence of the long-drawn-out negotiations over the latest reform appears to be little or no long-term saving to the taxpayer or reduction in generosity, on average, of pensions for public service workers.'

A spokeswoman for the Treasury said the current situation with public sector pensions was 'untenable' and changes proposed by the government would save tens of millions of pounds over the next few decades.

'These savings are achieved by a number of changes, including asking people to work longer, pay higher contributions and changing the way pensions keep pace with inflation in retirement. These have to be seen as a whole package and were negotiated as such. This analysis only looks at one of these elements and as such is partial and misleading,' she said.

'Asking people to work to state pension age will, as the IFS acknowledge, deliver savings to the taxpayer. This is because people will people working longer will pay more tax and contributions and receive pensions for less time in retirement.'

This article appeared in our January 2011 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
01
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£95000 - £120000 per annum + benefits
Reference
118966

Senior Longevity Actuary – Reinsurance

London (Central)
£100,000
Reference
118949

Senior Capital Actuary

London (Central)
£90000 - £110000 per annum + + bonus + benefits
Reference
118965
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200