Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January 2011
01

ACA slams Solvency II-style pensions proposals

Open-access content Tuesday 10th January 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Proposals to adopt a Solvency II-style approach to pensions funding requirements are ‘inappropriate, unaffordable and unnecessary’, according to the Association of Consulting Actuaries (ACA).

2

Responding to the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) consultation on changes to the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORP) Directive, the ACA said there was mounting concern that fierce opposition from a number of UK bodies would not be echoed across the EU, where funded pensions are not widespread.

The ACA believes a majority approach could jeopardise the established arrangements in the UK, and accelerate the closure of yet more UK private sector defined benefit pensions where funding calls on businesses would increase substantially.    

ACA international committee chairman, Paul Kelly, said: "The purpose of the IORP directive is supposed to be to create an internal market for occupational retirement provision by setting the prudent person rule and making it possible to operate across borders. 

"The principal focus of this consultation is solvency and it therefore fails to address the real issues which are or may be preventing wider cross border activity. Solvency is not the problem here, save that the existing requirement for "full solvency" in any cross border scheme is, in many cases, an absolute barrier to wider corporate interest and activity in cross-border pensions."

Mr Kelly went on to say that: "Overall, there would not be enough actuaries in Europe to begin to deal with the workload, should the complexities described in this consultation ever be visited upon us, regardless of the simple truth that a Solvency II type regime is inappropriate, unaffordable and unnecessary for pensions."

Main points from the ACA's consultation response:

*  The level of harmonisation proposed is not appropriate or achievable, given the other tax and legislative differences that remain across the European states. If harmonisation was indeed the goal, these measures fail by excluding book reserves. Indeed, the measures will dramatically increase the disparity between a book reserve system and a funded system, to the point where logically sponsors and indeed Member States may chose to amend systems of provision so that book reserves will become dominant, which many would see as a totally inappropriate outcome.

*  Rather than harmonisation for its own sake (an unworkable and unattainable ideal), better for the EU to focus on cross-border provision. The ACA says the case for massive upheaval, which a complete overhaul of the system of solvency regulation would certainly entail, has not been made. Taking the UK system for example (including protection mechanisms such as the PPF and the active role of the Pensions Regulator) there is no evidence presented that it is failing to serve consumers.

*  The EIOPA consultation looks at three objectives - adequacy, security and sustainability. The ACA says importing a complex Solvency II type system onto already complex Member State systems of prudential and social regulation runs counter to and may paradoxically jeopardise the "adequacy" and "sustainability" limbs presently in place.

*  The requirements are overly complex for regulating an industry that has social aims as well as financial objectives and which makes provision at a small business level. Comparability and harmonisation between insurers makes sense, because they compete in the market for business. There is no such competition between IORPs. 

*  The concept of "transfer value" solvency, which assumes the need to aim for a world where a (distressed) sponsor can readily transfer its IORP in full to an insurer, is misplaced and is rejected by the ACA. In practice, the UK already has the PPF, as required by long-standing EU law (article 8 of the 1980 Pensions Directive). This additional concept of transfer to an insurance company is inconsistent, unnecessary and overly onerous.  Furthermore for decades it has been possible to transfer individuals, blocks of membership and indeed whole schemes from IORP to IORP. Portability is already enshrined.

*  A risk-free approach to interest rates is as unworkable as it is unaffordable, says the ACA, most particularly within the EU at present. 

*  Of the three options discussed in the EIOPA paper as regards the calculation of "best estimate" funding, Option 3, the two-tier approach, does have merit in principle, says the ACA, provided the implementation is largely left to Member States.

*  Sitting alongside this two-tier approach, the "holistic balance sheet" as proposed in the EIOPA paper is, in practice, unworkable says the ACA.  The difficulties with placing formal monetary value on the value of the sponsor covenant are massively understated in the consultation.  Practical experience in the UK demonstrates such assessments are prone either to be hugely expensive, multi-disciplinary and time-consuming exercises, or to be shallow.  Even a limited exercise such as the valuation of intangible assets such as "brand" is fraught with difficulty and subjective opinion.  The ACA says there is no evidence that the current UK system of covenant assessment is so flawed as to require an EU approach to be prescribed.

*  As regards DC schemes, the calculation and maintenance of a reserve to cover operational risk will add significantly to frictional costs. The logical consequence is for the sponsor to move to a contract basis where this reserve is "implicit" and is in fact paid for by members by way of lower returns, the further disadvantage that trustee oversight will be lost.

*  The ACA says the supervisor's power to set Technical Provisions should be left to Member States. 

The complete ACA response can be found at www.aca.org.uk (See 'Recent Publications').

The Actuarial Profession's consultation response can be found at http://www.actuaries.org.uk/research-and-resources/documents/eiopa-cp-11006-response

 
This article appeared in our January 2011 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Solvency II for pensions may mean £600bn funding increase

A Solvency II approach to pensions could require UK schemes to increase funding by £600bn or more, according to analysis by J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
Tuesday 10th January 2012
Open-access content
2

Actuaries raise doubts over insurance data processes

Only one in five actuaries and insurance finance professionals are fully confident of their firm’s data control processes and spreadsheet supervision, according to research from ClusterSeven.
Tuesday 10th January 2012
Open-access content
2

Data and risk modelling top insurers' Solvency II compliance needs

Reliance on third-parties for data, sophisticated risk modelling needs and obtaining detailed fund data are the key challenges faced by European insurers in complying with Solvency II.
Friday 13th January 2012
Open-access content
2

Risk managers unprepared for flock of black swans

Many companies’ risk management practices are increasingly outmoded, leaving them exposed to a new risk landscape of catastrophic ‘black swan’ events, according to a paper by PwC.
Tuesday 17th January 2012
Open-access content

Solvency II and flood cover among top ABI priorities for 2012

Reaching agreement with government on flood insurance and getting Solvency II ‘over the finishing line’ are among the top priorities for the Association of British Insurers in 2012, director general Otto Thoreson said yesterday.
Friday 27th January 2012
Open-access content
2

Solvency II ECON vote delay causes concern

The delayed Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee (ECON) vote on the European Parliament’s amendments to the Omnibus II text could have a knock-on effect on the timetable for Solvency II implementation, according to PwC.
Friday 13th January 2012
Open-access content

Latest from Position

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
2

Expert advice

This edition of the magazine focuses on data science and its applications, which will be a recurring theme for the IFoA.
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content
2

Tesla sparks fears of insurance market overhaul

That is according to a new report from Moody's, which highlights how Tesla has already started offering premiums that are up to 30% cheaper than those of mainstream insurers.
Friday 14th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from General Insurance

td

Brain power

The latest microchips mimic cerebral function. Smaller, faster and more efficient than their predecessors, they have the potential to save lives and help insurers, argues Amarnath Suggu
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
bl

'Takaful' models of Islamic insurance

Ethical, varied and a growing market – ‘takaful’ Islamic insurance is worth knowing about, wherever you’re from and whatever your beliefs, says Ali Asghar Bhuriwala
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
il

When 'human' isn't female

It was only last year that the first anatomically correct female crash test dummy was created. With so much data still based on the male perspective, are we truly meeting all consumer needs? Adél Drew discusses her thoughts, based on the book Invisible Women by Caroline Criado Perez
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content

Latest from January 2011

Profession: Making connections with MSc students

The Actuarial Profession is looking to provide a bridge between companies and academia by encouraging participation in MSc projects to investigate industry issues. Here Andy Cox and Woojin Oh discuss their experiences as employer and student respectively.
Tuesday 31st January 2012
Open-access content

Public pension reforms 'unlikely to save money in long-term'

The government’s latest offer on public sector pension reform is unlikely to save money over the longer term, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Tuesday 31st January 2012
Open-access content

Careers: The actuary as leader

Actuaries who can add leadership skills to their undoubted technical expertise are likely to find themselves in high demand, says Daphna Horowitz
Tuesday 31st January 2012
Open-access content

Latest from formbuilder_item_removed

2

Implementing IFRS 17 Discount Curves: Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 requires liability cash flows to be discounted at rates that reflect the characteristics of the cash flows, including their liquidity
Tuesday 3rd September 2019
Open-access content
2

Profit Emergence Under IFRS 9 and IFRS 17: The impact of choice of liability discount rate

With the IFRS 17 accounting standard, insurers need to understand the patterns of profit emergence that arise under the standard, and how current business and methodology decisions affect such patterns.
Wednesday 10th July 2019
Open-access content
2

Whitepaper: Aggregation and diversification of the IFRS 17 Risk Adjustment

This paper forms part of a series of high-level papers designed to provide an introduction to different features of the risk adjustment that should be considered in advance of implementation.
Tuesday 29th January 2019
Open-access content

Latest from small_opening_image

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 01

Public pension reforms 'unlikely to save money in long-term'

The government’s latest offer on public sector pension reform is unlikely to save money over the longer term, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Tuesday 31st January 2012
Open-access content

Clarity needed on UK flood risks in face of climate change

Question marks over who will foot the rising bill for flood protection are ‘fuelling uncertainty’ over the future availability and affordability of insurance cover for buildings in areas at risk of flooding, MPs said today.
Monday 30th January 2012
Open-access content

Research finds businesses are unprepared for auto-enrolment

Over 70% of larger employers haven’t completed plans for pensions auto-enrolment with only nine months to go before the system begins to be put into operation, according to research by Clear Path Analysis.
Monday 30th January 2012
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pricing Trading Manager - Contract

£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
148579

Head of Financial Risk

Flexible / hybrid working with minimum 2 days p/w office-based
£ excellent package
Reference
148578

Insurance Risk Leader

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ to attract the best
Reference
148577
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ