Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2011
12

Pensioners losing out due to QE focus on long-dated gilts

Open-access content Thursday 15th December 2011 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Defined benefit pension funds would be significantly better off if the recent rounds of quantitative easing had been focused away from the purchase of long-dated gilts, according to Pension Corporation...

2

The firm said that DB schemes would have seen their liabilities rise by only a fraction of the estimated figure of £200 billion and called for any future QE to return to its original mandate of buying stressed assets off banks' balance sheets.


Pension Corporation pointed to figures from the Bank of England's Q3 2011 Bulletin which estimated that QE had dropped gilt yields by 1% but noted that the effect on DB pension funds' c.£1 trillion of liabilities is different across the yield curve. The over-25-year liabilities increase by almost £110 billion, the 10 to 25-year liabilities increase by £67 billion, and the 0 to10-year liabilities by only £13 billion.


The firm said that the impact on long-dated liabilities is heightened. Over-25-year liabilities typically represent about 30% of the value of a DB pension fund's liabilities, but about 58% of overall rate sensitivity. This means that the majority of the c.£200 billion rise in liabilities may be as a result of the long-dated liabilities moving more for a similar rate shift than shorter-dated liabilities. 


Pension Corporation had previously estimated that pension fund deficits were pushed out by a net £74 billion under the first round of QE - the increase in liabilities minus the estimated rise in equities and bonds2. This means sponsors could be forced to pay an additional £7.4 billion a year until at least 2020 into their pension fund to cover the additional £74 billion hole created by QE1.


The firm said that it recognised the wider benefits of the QE programme but in the interests of UK pension funds, said that QE2 should not buy gilts with a maturity longer than 25 years and should return to the original mandate which did not target these long-dated gilts.

Pension Corporation also called for policy to address the stressed areas of the economy by buying stressed assets off banks' balance sheets. The firm believes this would maintain a low gilt yield, allow banks to be more certain of their asset values and make them more likely to lend, and would help drive economic growth by supporting corporate sponsors. Pension fund deficits may actually narrow under this scenario.


At the long end, Pension Corporation noted that the Government is the main beneficiary of low yields as it has issued 75% of all the long Sterling fixed rate bonds since 2009, and pension funds are the main losers.


Mark Gull, co-head of asset-liability management, said:

"The Chancellor's number one metric for measuring international confidence in the UK's economic policy is the yield available on Gilts, which is now lower than that for German bonds. By this measure, and this measure alone, he is succeeding in keeping the UK out of intensive care. What is less well understood, however, is that by targeting Gilts with maturities over 25 years, where the Government is by far the main beneficiary, QE is damaging pension funds.


"QE2 and any further rounds should revert to QE's original form, and not target over-25- year maturity Gilts, as well as addressing the stressed areas of the economy. This would help pensioners, UK corporate sponsors and the wider economy."

This article appeared in our December 2011 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
12
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pensions Actuarial Analyst

London, Midlands, Scotland
£Market Competitive
Reference
143788

Senior Manager/Director level roles - Life insurance

Stirling
Generous salary with excellent bonus and benefits
Reference
143787

Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£60-90K depending on experience
Reference
143786
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ