Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2018
05
General Features
Topics

The case for consolidation

Open-access content Tuesday 8th May 2018 — updated 1.40pm, Wednesday 6th May 2020

John Herbert discusses the merits of consolidating defined benefit pension plans using a sectionalised master trust approach

2

The relationship between many defined benefit pension plans and their sponsors has changed significantly over the past 10 years. Very few current employees in the private sector continue to benefit from these arrangements, and they are now largely viewed as a financial legacy rather than part of current remuneration policy.

Existing structures and solutions appear to be under significant stress, with sponsors paying in substantial amounts of cash, yet, in some cases, members are still not getting their full benefits. Consequently, changes over the next 10 years may be even more significant as challenges emerge to deliver better solutions for both members and sponsors. 

The consensus view is that a process of 'consolidation', such that the number of defined benefit plans reduces significantly, may provide a suitable solution. However, there are diverging views on how this should be done and the timescale over which it can be achieved. 

A number of solutions have been proposed as summarised in the table below. Most aim to reduce both operational costs and financial risk. 

Figure 1

With the exception of superfunds, many of these solutions are already available, so why are they not being used more extensively? The main reasons are probably a reluctance to change, owing to either inertia, uncertainty or, possibly, the upfront transition costs.

In addition, the scale of the risks, both financial and reputational, are yet to fully emerge. Recent high-profile corporate failures have highlighted pension issues and the likely reduction to member benefits. Further ahead, the human resources required to continue to provide these services is likely to come under severe strain. 

Once the risks of maintaining the status quo and taking no action become clearer, these products and solutions are likely to become widely adopted by many pension plans. So the question is when rather than if, and whether one single option will prevail or whether there will be a range of solutions to choose from.

Smaller plans 

Typically, smaller plans have higher operational and management costs (compared to their asset size) and are likely to see the greatest savings from 'consolidation'. Increased scale may also lead to stronger governance and better risk management. 

Smaller plans also face other issues, such as access to insurance buyout solutions at a competitive price and possibly access to some specialist skills around investments. For very small plans, the issue of adequate service provision at an affordable price may already be starting to emerge.

Sectionalised master trust

The master trust solution has been widely adopted for defined contribution plans, providing economies of scale, access to a wider range of investments and stronger governance. These benefits can also be provided to defined benefit plans.

The defined benefit master trust is a medium/long-term consolidation solution that reduces both governance risks and operational cost for the sponsor. There are some upfront costs involved, but operational costs (both direct and indirect) should be greatly reduced. In most cases, the break-even point should be relatively short.

The sectionalised master trust ringfences assets and liabilities for each employer, so that there are no cross-subsidies and no risk that one employer may need to contribute towards the liabilities of any other employers. Each section has its own funding plan and investment strategy, so the employer retains overall strategic control of the pension plan. 

Unlike the non-sectionalised master trust, it remains very straightforward to move all the assets and liabilities to another consolidation solution without incurring significant exit penalties.

It should be viewed as a change of management (or governance) structure rather than a transfer of risk. In nearly all cases, these master trusts are run by professional independent trustees, who take on the responsibility for compliance, governance and management and use their expertise to find the most efficient solution for the participating employers. 

In summary, the sectionalised defined benefit master trust offers the following features:

Figure 2

Member perspective

While the benefits to sponsors are clear, what will be the likely impact on the members of a plan choosing to join a defined benefit master trust?

Overall, this should be very limited. There may be a new service provider and possibly some new contact details, but the member should not see too many changes. Potentially, service will improve as a result of being part of a larger pension plan with stronger governance and controls. 

Financial security will remain unaffected, with the same sponsor and covenant, while the funding level will also be unchanged because all the assets and liabilities will be transferred across. Lastly, the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) remains in place as a backstop if needed. 

Over the medium term, security for members would be expected to improve more quickly as a result of lower operational costs, so more of the contributions can be used to improve the funding level. Furthermore, economies of scale mean that the investments are likely to provide better risk-adjusted returns.

Experience in other countries

The UK has seen the number of defined benefit pension plans fall by around 20% over the past 20 years through mergers, insurance buyouts and entry into the PPF. This is fairly typical where there has been a passive approach and no positive action on consolidation.

In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Australia, where positive consolidation steps have been taken, the number of defined benefit pension plans has reduced by 70% or more. This has been achieved through master trusts, industry-wide schemes and buyout solutions, but changes to legislation and simplification of benefits have also played a significant role in the process. 

Why now?

The focus has moved very quickly on to the costs of managing legacy defined benefit pension plans and the additional financial burden this places on UK companies. For many sponsors, the cost of an insurance buyout is simply too high or does not represent efficient use of capital. 

Other solutions, such as full-service providers, are unlikely to make enough difference to costs to have a real impact. The superfunds approach will require fundamental changes to legislation and take significant time to deliver. 

The master trust can deliver the level of cost savings needed and really only needs confidence from employers (and trustees) to overcome the current inertia in the decision-making process. It still provides flexibility to take advantage of any simplification or harmonisation that may be available at a later date and may also accelerate the path towards a full settlement through an insurance buyout.

John Herbert is chief actuary at Premier

This article appeared in our May 2018 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

mark

Investing in change

Mark Azzopardi talks with Stephen Hyams about how asset managers advise insurance companies in a rapidly changing world
Tuesday 8th May 2018
Open-access content
2

The great juggling act

The current pace of change in regulatory and accounting standards makes now a better time than ever for firms to revisit their asset liability management strategies, argues Richard Schneider
Tuesday 8th May 2018
Open-access content
2

The challenge of maturity

Costas Yiasoumi and John McAleer discuss the challenges faced by mature defined benefit pension schemes and present a framework for managing their run-off
Tuesday 8th May 2018
Open-access content
2

A watching brief

Mark Azzopardi, managing director and head of insurance client strategy at BlackRock, has had a varied career in investments, pension consulting, general insurance and banking.
Tuesday 8th May 2018
Open-access content
2

No ivory tower

IFoA Regulation Board chairman Desmond Hudson and the IFoA's general counsel, Ben Kemp, talk to Chris Seekings about the profession’s evolving regulatory landscape
Wednesday 9th May 2018
Open-access content
2

Advent of change

Jason Whalley believes change is inevitable, uncompromising, and generally for the good.
Thursday 10th May 2018
Open-access content

Latest from Risk & ERM

KV

Liability-driven investments: new landscape

What now for liability-driven investments, after last year’s crash in the market? Pensions experts Rakesh Girdharlal and Moiz Khan say it should lead to a more balanced approach
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
cj

Natural capital investing

Chris Howells and Andrew Dreaneen discuss how today’s investments in natural capital profit portfolios as well as the planet and humanity
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
bl

'Takaful' models of Islamic insurance

Ethical, varied and a growing market – ‘takaful’ Islamic insurance is worth knowing about, wherever you’re from and whatever your beliefs, says Ali Asghar Bhuriwala
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content

Latest from Homepage slider

web_p16_Craig_DSC_7231

Interview: Craig Turnbull

Craig Turnbull has held senior industry positions in global consulting, software and asset management businesses, and has particular interest and experience in risk, capital, valuation and investment.
Wednesday 5th February 2020
Open-access content
2

A fairer outcome

Dr Ian Sharpe discusses the Pensions Advisory Groups guide to good practice in the area of pensions on divorce
Thursday 5th December 2019
Open-access content
Screen Shot 2020-05-07 at 11.40.34.png

For what it's worth

Tiffany Honour of the Current Pensions Review Working Party asks: are cash equivalent transfer values being set at the right level?
Tuesday 5th November 2019
Open-access content

Latest from May 2018

2

Mandatory climate risk reporting proposed for pension funds

Pension funds may be forced to report their exposure to climate change risks by 2022 under proposals put forward by the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) today.
Monday 4th June 2018
Open-access content

Investors warned of 'antibiotic crisis' facing global food companies

The large majority of meat, fish and dairy suppliers across the world are leaving human health at risk by failing to reduce the excessive use of antibiotics in the rearing of animals.
Wednesday 30th May 2018
Open-access content

Investor risk appetite falls amid geopolitical uncertainty

The success of the Five Star Movement and League party in Italy has dampened the appetite for risk among institutional investors across Europe, new research has found.
Wednesday 30th May 2018
Open-access content

Latest from small_opening_image

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from General Features

yguk

Is anybody out there?

There’s no point speaking if no one hears you. Effective communication starts with silence – this is the understated art of listening, says Tan Suee Chieh
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
ers

By halves

Reducing the pensions gap between men and women is a work in progress – and there’s still a long way to go, with women retiring on 50% less than men, says Alexandra Miles
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
web_Question-mark-lightbulbs_credit_iStock-1348235111.png

Figuring it out

Psychologist Wendy Johnson recalls how qualifying as an actuary and running her own consultancy in the US allowed her to overcome shyness and gave her essential skills for life
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content

Latest from Topics

Professional

Professional
Monday 16th April 2012
Open-access content

International

International
Monday 16th April 2012
Open-access content

Environment

Environment
Monday 16th April 2012
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pricing Trading Manager - Contract

£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
148579

Head of Financial Risk

Flexible / hybrid working with minimum 2 days p/w office-based
£ excellent package
Reference
148578

Insurance Risk Leader

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ to attract the best
Reference
148577
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ