Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2021
General Features

Extraordinary years: The CMI’s approach to 2020-21 mortality data

Open-access content Wednesday 1st December 2021 — updated 9.15am, Thursday 2nd December 2021
web_abstract-data_credit_iStock-655864390.png

Matthew Edwards and Steve Bale explain the CMI’s approach to the use of 2020/2021 data, given COVID-19’s effect on mortality during that period 

This article sets out the CMI’s intentions regarding the use of 2020 and 2021 data, particularly pensioner, annuitant and life assurance mortality. How useful can mortality data from 2020 and 2021 be, given the abnormality of these years? The same question also faces actuaries working in life insurance and pensions.

The year 2020 was extraordinary (and we hope unique) for mortality because of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the UK there were approximately 73,000 excess deaths above that expected based on mortality in 2019 (the CMI’s excess deaths measure). We are now most of the way through 2021, and deaths from COVID-19 are still a significant number (70,000 to 5 November, based on ONS information on deaths with COVID-19 listed on the death certificate). However, the 2021 mortality experience is unusual owing to factors beyond COVID-19 deaths: in particular, increased other-cause (non-COVID-19) deaths arising from diagnoses and treatment that have been delayed due to lockdowns, and a reduction in deaths due to people having died from COVID-19 in 2020 who might otherwise have been expected to die in 2021 (the ‘forward displacement’ effect). 

The CMI’s use of experience data

The experience investigations we carry out in the CMI fall broadly into two types: 

  • ‘Actual versus expected’ experience analyses, where we assess how the experience of a year or group of years compares with what would be expected based on the most appropriate tables. The CMI will carry on doing this type of analysis on 2020 and 2021 data. This will help subscribers to benchmark how their own experience compares with the market. 
  • Development of new mortality tables, from analysis of the probability of death at any age followed by smoothing across the age range (‘graduation’, primarily to remove noise). This work aims to derive mortality tables that are predictive of future experience. Clearly, deriving tables based partially on unadjusted 2020 and/or 2021 CMI data is unlikely to be predictive. However, we have not found a satisfactory way to adjust 2020 or 2021 CMI data for this purpose, as we will discuss. Therefore, as a general tenet, the CMI is not intending to develop new mortality tables using data from 2020 or 2021. 

Possible approaches to adjusting the 2020 and 2021 experience

We have spent much time considering whether we can remove the pandemic’s effect from the 2020 and 2021 mortality data. We have considered two approaches – a ‘bottom up’ approach using data on deaths directly attributable to COVID-19, and a ‘top-down’ approach looking at ‘excess deaths’ (deaths above those expected, and hence likely attributable to the pandemic). 

Bottom-up approach 

A bottom-up approach could work using (in the case of the UK) ONS data on deaths with COVID-19 listed on the death certificate, or UK Health Security Agency (formerly PHE) data on deaths within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test. However, there are several areas of difficulty:

  • Some COVID-19 deaths are likely to have been assigned as other causes of death
  • We would need to calculate a COVID-19 mortality age curve from public domain data
  • Insurance portfolios and pension funds typically exhibit different socioeconomic profiles from the general population, so we would need to allow for how COVID-19 affects these different ‘insured’ lives
  • We would need to calculate an ‘amounts weighted’ equivalent of the above (without confounding with the socioeconomic effect). 

Each of these steps involves substantial subjectivity and room for error, so the combination of these steps would likely lead to results that would be of little use. 

A further concern with this approach is that, while it is almost plausible in dealing with 2020, it would be of no use in 2021 because the other elements making 2021 an abnormal year (for instance, forward displacement and delayed diagnoses) would not be allowed for. But we would want any adjustment approach to work well in both years (and perhaps even 2022).

Overall, therefore, we do not regard this approach as being a useful way to adjust 2020 and 2021 data.

Top-down approach 

A top-down approach would seek to define deaths caused by the pandemic as the difference between actual deaths and those that would otherwise have been expected, this difference being the ‘excess’. This has been a very useful approach for quantifying the pandemic’s overall mortality impact for the purpose of the CMI’s regular mortality monitoring.

However, it is not so well-suited to adjusting 2020 and 2021 data for the purpose of subsequent analyses of that adjusted data. The reason is that the ‘actual less expected’ method is sensitive to what we define ‘expected mortality’ to be. In simple terms, we would be quantifying ‘non-pandemic deaths’ as (actual deaths less excess deaths), where excess deaths are themselves defined as (actual deaths less expected deaths). In a circular fashion, we end up calculating non-pandemic deaths as expected deaths. 

This means we are not bringing any information on actual 2020 or 2021 mortality into our analysis: we have simply brought in a prior expectation through the back door. For this reason, the top-down approach is of no use in adjusting data to arrive at an idea of what 2020 (or 2021) mortality has been ‘absent the pandemic’.

Post-pandemic mortality

Perhaps more importantly, when will we start to understand the shape of post-pandemic mortality? 

It may be that the first consecutive four-year period we are able to use for developing tables is the period 2022-2025, in which case the underlying work would not be done until 2027 at the earliest. However, work on ‘actual v expected’ in respect of the individual years (especially 2022 and 2023) will give a much earlier view on what post-pandemic mortality for insured portfolios and pension funds looks like.

Any question about post-pandemic mortality raises the question of what our plans are for the Mortality Projections Model. Here, we have similar concerns about the unrepresentative nature of 2020 and 2021. The Mortality Projections Committee has therefore adjusted the method in the model: for CMI_2020, ‘weights’ were introduced, with nil weight being the default option for 2020 (in other words, the model excludes the data for 2020 during its fitting process), and full weight placed on data for other years. The current intention is to take a similar approach for CMI_2021, placing nil weight on data for both 2020 and 2021.

We hope this has been useful in outlining the CMI’s direction of travel concerning the use of 2020 and 2021 data. The CMI is working in a very strange period of mortality experience, but we will do the most we can for our subscribers with the available data – just as we have done throughout the pandemic. 

Matthew Edwards is chair of the CMI Executive.

Steve Bale is chair of the CMI COVID-19 Working Party.

Image credit | iStock
 
ACT Dec21_Full LR.jpg
This article appeared in our December 2021 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

Jørgen Randers: An end to growth?

Jørgen Randers: An end to growth?

Professor Jørgen Randers talks to Chris Seekings almost 50 years after the publication of his report The Limits to Growth, and outlines what we can expect for the world during the next half-century
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Enhancing reinsurance

Enhancing reinsurance

Enhancing reinsurance is an essential part of optimising life and health insurance companies’ financial position, says Greg Solomon
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Unfamiliar territory for artifical intelligence-related risk

Unfamiliar territory for artificial intelligence-related risk

Artificial intelligence-related risk differs from traditional model risk, explain Andrew Morgan, Valerie du Preez and Natasha Naidoo –how can we get to grips with it?
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Cutting the bias: Modelling the impact of Covid-19

Cutting the bias: Modelling the impact of Covid-19

Stephen Richards demonstrates how to model the impact of COVID-19 on portfolio mortality experience
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Lessons learnt from long-term care insurance in Israel

Lessons learnt from long-term care insurance in Israel

Amiad Ben-Meir and David Zaray-Mizrahi set out the successes and failures of long-term care insurance in Israel, and the lessons learnt by the country’s insurance sector along the way
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Considering the concept of exclusion-free insurance

Considering the concept of exclusion-free insurance

Richard Hartigan discusses the possibility of an insurance policy without exclusions
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content

Latest from General Features

yguk

Is anybody out there?

There’s no point speaking if no one hears you. Effective communication starts with silence – this is the understated art of listening, says Tan Suee Chieh
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
ers

By halves

Reducing the pensions gap between men and women is a work in progress – and there’s still a long way to go, with women retiring on 50% less than men, says Alexandra Miles
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
web_Question-mark-lightbulbs_credit_iStock-1348235111.png

Figuring it out

Psychologist Wendy Johnson recalls how qualifying as an actuary and running her own consultancy in the US allowed her to overcome shyness and gave her essential skills for life
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content

Latest from December 2021

Puzzles-iStock-1146577830.jpg

Puzzles December 2021

The November puzzles and the solutions are viewable in PDF format only.
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
People and society news: December

People and society news: December

Mr Piyush Majmudar (pictured, on left, with Tan Suee Chieh) passed away on 4 November 2021, just short of 90 years old. He qualified as a Fellow of the Institute of Actuaries in 1968 , becoming part of the early generation of actuaries in India.
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Best kept secrets

Best kept secrets

Adeetya Tantia reflects on increasing concern around data privacy, and whether it may halt the predicted personalisation of insurance pricing
Wednesday 1st December 2021
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

BPA Transition Manager

London, England / Edinburgh, Scotland
£45000 - £65000 per annum + market leading bonus and benefits
Reference
148878

London Market Pricing Contracts - Inside & Outside IR35

London (Central)
£1000 - £1300 per day
Reference
148877

SME Pricing Director

London (Central), London (Greater)
£225K + bonus + benefits
Reference
148872
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ