Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2019
09

A balancing act 

Open-access content Monday 9th September 2019 — updated 3.02pm, Friday 1st May 2020

Companies should not assume their existing discount rate approaches will comply withIFRS 17, warns Daryl Boxall

2

—

Following more than 10 years of development, the International Accounting Standards Board issued IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts in May 2017, replacing the interim standard IFRS 4.

Under IFRS 4, insurers were able to adopt a wide range of approaches to account for insurance contracts. This complexity made it difficult for investors and analysts to compare insurance companies across products and jurisdictions, and ambiguity in reporting can create a barrier to investment in the insurance sector. The purpose of IFRS 17 is to provide a single accounting model so that investors can better understand the financial performance of insurers and compare the sector more readily with other industries.

What is changing?

IFRS 17 will fundamentally change how insurers construct their balance sheets, report profit or loss, and disclose information. 

The standard introduces a fundamental measurement approach called the 'general model' - this is the default approach for assessing insurance contracts. There are two adaptations to this: the 'variable fee approach', which applies to contracts with certain ('direct') participation features, and the 'premium allocation approach', which is a simplification for eligible contracts with a coverage period of a year or less. This article focuses on the general model.

Insurers' balance sheets will look different under IFRS 17, and will consist of four building blocks, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Insurers’ balance sheet elements under IFRS 17

What are the requirements around discount rates?

Under the general model, an adjustment for time value of money is made by discounting future cashflows. IFRS 17 refers to two methods for deriving appropriate discount rates:

Bottom-up: "an entity may determine discount rates by adjusting a liquid risk-free yield curve to reflect … the liquidity characteristics of the insurance contracts"

Top-down: "an entity may determine the appropriate discount rates … based on a yield curve that reflects… a reference portfolio of assets … [and] eliminates any factors that are not relevant to the insurance contracts."

 

Figure 2

The discount rate has a number of purposes in the IFRS 17 framework, and will impact both balance sheet and profit or loss accounts:

  • Discounting fulfilment cashflows: contracted cashflows are discounted to reflect time value of money and allow for illiquidity of insurance liabilities
     
  • Measuring changes in the Contractual Service Margin (CSM): CSM is determined at policy inception, and the rate used to calculate the CSM is 'locked in' at that date. Changes in the expected cashflows of the policy will result in a recalculation of the CSM at that 'locked-in' rate. The discount rate also determines interest accrued on the CSM which is a negative to profit or loss account
     
  • Determining the insurance finance income/expense in profit or loss: Firms can choose to recognise the change in liabilities due to discount rate movements in other comprehensive income, which will reduce volatility in reported profit or loss. 

Given these applications, it is important to consider which features of discount rates will be desirable. Firms will look to adopt a discount rate approach that optimises the level, timing and volatility of shareholder equity and profit or loss. For some, this will mean a high illiquidity premium in order to maximise CSM and provide loss absorbency; for others, it will mean close matching of illiquidity premium to the treatment adopted for the firm's assets in order to minimise volatility in profit or loss.

How does this compare with existing approaches?

Given the changes introduced by IFRS 17, firms' existing discount rate approaches under IFRS 4 will likely no longer be appropriate. However, there are some clear parallels with the discount rate methods outlined in the standard and the volatility adjustment (VA) and matching adjustment (MA) under Solvency II.

There are operational reasons why firms may wish to align with their existing approaches under Solvency II, rather than incur the development cost of complex new systems and processes. However, several features of the MA and VA calculations are not compliant with the standard.

 

FIGURE 3: Comparison of the IFRS 17 discount rate principles with Solvency II matching adjustment and volatility adjustment

Adjusting for liquidity of insurance contracts

Under both approaches, the standard asserts that discount rates should be appropriate to the liquidity of the relevant insurance contracts. IFRS 17 is principles-based, so there is little guidance provided on how to determine insurance contract liquidity, but we can take a steer from how other industry activities have approached this problem.

During the development of Solvency II, before the adoption of the MA and VA methodologies, the European Commission's Quantitative Impact Study 5 recommended grouping liabilities into different 'buckets' depending on the nature of their liquidity - for example 100% of the calculated illiquidity premium was applied to immediate annuities, 75% to with-profits business and 50% for all other business. More recently, work on the International Capital Standard has heralded a similar approach, grouping liabilities into 'top', 'middle' and 'general' buckets, which receive 100%, 90% and 80% of the calculated illiquidity premium respectively.

While this grouping approach makes operational sense for many firms, it is not clear that it is always appropriate to haircut the illiquidity premium - for example, it is optional in the standard for firms using a top-down approach.

It is generally expected that an illiquidity premium derived from high quality corporate bonds will be lower than an illiquidity premium derived from less liquid assets (eg infrastructure debt). Similarly, it may not be appropriate to further reduce illiquidity premiums where they have been derived from assets that are more liquid than liabilities (eg for immediate annuities). The industry has further work to do in determining the most appropriate approach.

While there are operational benefits from aligning the IFRS 17 discount rate method with existing processes, firms should not assume that their existing discount rate approaches will be compliant. Solvency II MA and VA offer sensible starting points for consideration, but they will not meet the requirements of the standard without methodological changes. 

There are likely to be significant commercial benefits available to firms that invest time and resources into determining an approach that balances compliance, development costs and optimal financial outcomes. This may not be a trivial exercise - particularly for firms with complex product ranges or those which operate across a number of economies.

Daryl Boxall is a capital management actuary at Prudential plc, and a member of the IFoA IFRS 17 Futures of Discount Rates working party

 


 

This article appeared in our September 2019 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Applying environmental pressure

Robert Blood explains how non-governmental organisations are influencing behaviour on environmental, social and governance issues
Monday 9th September 2019
Open-access content
2

De-risking too far?

Simon Willes explains why investment de-risking a pension scheme without regard to employer covenant may not lead to optimal member outcomes
Monday 9th September 2019
Open-access content
Insurers urged to offer on-demand policies as InsurTech funding soars

Insurers urged to offer on-demand policies as InsurTech funding soars

Insurance firms can no longer rely on their brand names to retain customers and should offer instant, flexible and digital quotes, a leading data analytics company has said.
Tuesday 3rd September 2019
Open-access content
2

A volatile business

Henry Simmons and Lloyd Jones ask: are UK property indices misleading?
Thursday 3rd October 2019
Open-access content
web_women_shutterstock_110774573

A woman's work

It's been 100 years since the IFoA's forerunners voted to admit women to their ranks; we examine the process that led to that important decision
Friday 4th October 2019
Open-access content
2

A stormy forecast

Mark Cornelius looks at regulator warnings about the financial risks from climate change
Monday 9th September 2019
Open-access content

Latest from September 2019

2

New ESG investment rules come into force

UK pension scheme trustees must consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors when making investments decisions under new rules that came into force today.
Tuesday 1st October 2019
Open-access content
New GMP equalisation guidance ©iStock

GMP equalisation guidance published

The Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) has today published further guidance for schemes undertaking guaranteed minimum pensions (GMP) equalisation.
Monday 30th September 2019
Open-access content
Further IFRS 17 changes proposed ©iStock

WTW proposes IFRS 17 changes

Willis Towers Watson (WTW) has recommended that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) make several additional amendments to IFRS 17.
Monday 30th September 2019
Open-access content

Latest from inline_image_missing_alt_text

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
2

Bitcoin: In the vaults

Blockchain technology and the trading of bitcoin were introduced in October 2008 in the famous paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from small_opening_image

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from inline_local_link

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 09

2

Interview: Mahidhara Davangere

Mahidhara Davangere has pursued a unique career path that stretches the limits of the actuarial profession. He tells Sharad Bajla about his priorities, his volunteering work, andwhat motivates him
Monday 9th September 2019
Open-access content
2

IFRS 17: Coming around again...

Martin Sarjeant outlines what companies need to do in the countdown to IFRS 17 implementation
Monday 9th September 2019
Open-access content
p32_81fiWHbook

Book review: The Past, Present and Future of Tontines

Phillip Hellwege’s The Past, Present and Future of Tontines will be of interest to historians of life annuities and people who are thinking of incorporating the tontine principle into modern insurance products.
Monday 9th September 2019
Open-access content

Latest from has_inline_pdf

2

Bitcoin: In the vaults

Blockchain technology and the trading of bitcoin were introduced in October 2008 in the famous paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Buried treasure: Could data regulations sink AI in Europe?

The wealth of data held by insurers is a treasure trove.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Machine learning with laser focus

Wind energy technology is relevant to the international political objectives of the Paris Agreement, UN Sustainability Goals, the declared climate emergency, reduction of pollution, and UK green growth strategy.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from Topics

2

Reinsurance: turning a problem into a solution

Reinsurance under IFRS17 typically has been perceived to be another question to be addressed. Wijdan Yousuf, Milena Lacheta and Colin Dutkiewicz suggest it can also be looked at as an answer
Wednesday 5th February 2020
Open-access content
2

The Actuary Puzzles February 2020

February puzzles and solutions.
Friday 31st January 2020
Open-access content
2

A case for greater disclosure

UK company accounts do not adequately explain defined benefit pension risks to investors, says Anne-Marie Winton.
Wednesday 24th October 2018
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Manager - Building new team!

London (Central)
Up to £130k + Bonus
Reference
148845

Shape the Future of Credit Risk Model Development

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ six figure salary with excellent bonus potential + package
Reference
148843

Longevity Director

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ six figure salary with excellent bonus potential + package
Reference
148842
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ