Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • March 2018
03

Sponsored feature: IFRS17 - managing the transition

Open-access content Monday 5th March 2018 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Matthew Ford outlines the possible transition measures – and their significance – for each group of contracts under the new standard


The long-awaited standard on insurance contracts, IFRS 17, was published on 18 May 2017, and the countdown is now on for companies to be ready for implementation. While the standard will have to be applied for reporting periods starting on or after 1 January 2021, this will require an opening balance sheet at 1 January 2020.

Given the scale of the standard's impact and its principles-based nature, insurers will need to make many technical decisions that will have significant financial and practical consequences on implementation. 

In this article, we look at the possible transition measures for each group of contracts that are available under IFRS 17. The decision made on the transition measures is one of the most significant choices for the standard's adoption, as it will impact the initial balance sheet, the level of future profit released and, as a result, affect future comparability between insurers over a long period of time, as well as the operational complexity of implementation.


Full retrospective approach

The first of three approaches available to insurers is the full retrospective approach, which has to be applied unless impracticable. What this means is that for each group and each cohort of contracts, an insurer must go right back to contract inception and project forward the contractual service margin from that date right up to the transition date.

This will involve a significant amount of historic data, assumptions at the point of sale and modelling complexity. Gathering information for contracts issued many years before transition could be either very costly or not possible.


Modified retrospective approach

Insurers able to demonstrate that the full retrospective approach is not a viable option can use either a modified retrospective approach or a fair value approach. The modified retrospective approach aims to achieve the outcome that most closely resembles the full retrospective approach, albeit with some approximations and simplifications along the way, using reasonable and supportable information available without undue cost or effort.

A key feature of the modified retrospective approach is that there is no requirement to divide the groups of contracts into annual cohorts, unless the insurer has reasonable and supportable information to justify the divisions, which could help make the data requirements less complex. However, the disclosures will still be quite onerous, and any approximations that are taken will need to be justified, not just at transition but every year thereafter.


Fair value approach

Under the fair value approach, the contractual service margin is determined as the difference between the fair value of a group of insurance contracts (measured in accordance with IFRS 13) and its fulfilment cashflows at the transition date (which are determined in accordance with IFRS 17). There is no requirement to divide the groups of contracts into annual cohorts.

Historically, many insurers issuing long-term contracts applied market consistent embedded value (MCEV) or European embedded value (EEV) principles to measure insurance contracts for supplementary reporting purposes. Where still produced, insurers will be able to use these measurements or other economic-based regulatory measures(such as Solvency II in Europe) as a starting point for the fair value approach on transition to IFRS 17, with adjustments to reflect market valuations. 

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) acknowledges that the optionality available on transition will result in less comparable financial statements until the contracts written before the transition date are derecognised. However, it concluded that the costs associated with the full retrospective approach or modified retrospective approach might exceed the benefits if there is little information available on the transition date.


p24-25-Stats-
Figure 2


Once selected, the transition approach will directly impact an insurer's financial results, both in terms of their Day 1 balance sheet and future profit emergence. For this reason, it is important that the decision is made based on a full appreciation of the financial and practical considerations:

  • What data is going to be required?
  • What calculations, engine and aggregation will be needed to perform the transition and future valuations?

Being able to identify necessary disclosures will allow users of financial statements to then assess the effect that contracts within the scope of IFRS 17 have on the insurer's:

  • Financial position
  • Performance
  • Dividend cashflows.

This will be a complex process, requiring quantitative and qualitative information about amounts recognised in the financial statements, significant judgements (and changes thereof), and the nature and extent of risks arising from contracts in the standard's scope.

Insurers will also benefit from communicating at an early stage to key stakeholders, including market analysts and shareholders, the expected impacts to the financial statements and profit profiles. This will require firms to source data and build a tool capable of estimating what these financial impacts will be, and how these compare with other metrics.

Further information

To learn more, please contact your Willis Towers Watson consultant, visit willistowerswatson.com/ifrs17 or email [email protected]

Matthew Ford is senior director, Insurance Consulting and Technology, Willis Towers Watson

This article appeared in our March 2018 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

Other Half Club looks forward to 30th anniversary year

On 10 November 2017, members of the Other Half Club met at the Café du Marché, Charterhouse Square, for the first dinner of the winter.
Wednesday 7th March 2018
Open-access content
2

Uncomfortable truths

Arno Kitts looks at some inconvenient facts about equity valuations and expected returns
Monday 5th March 2018
Open-access content
2

A disquieting and awesome prospect

Kateryna Katyukha Swiegers considers recent advances in human genome editing and what these could mean for insurers and wider society
Monday 5th March 2018
Open-access content
2

Mitigating the risks of epidemics

Petra Wildemann explores how to manage the risks of epidemics – from zoonotic diseases to human infections
Monday 5th March 2018
Open-access content
2

The cost of catastrophes

Junaid Seria looks back on 2017, a record year for devastating weather events
Monday 5th March 2018
Open-access content
2

David Braun interview: Risk and reward

David Braun, managing director and fixed income investment manager at PIMCO, is an actuary with a strong background in insurance and risk, experience which he says is invaluable when running investment portfolios for insurance companies.
Monday 5th March 2018
Open-access content

Latest from March 2018

2

Financial services sector fears Brexit more than any other threat

Brexit is seen as by far the biggest threat to the UK’s financial services sector this year, with cross-border access predicted to be the greatest challenge arising from the UK leaving the EU.
Monday 9th April 2018
Open-access content
2

'Shocking' disparity in pension incomes recorded across the UK

New government data reveals that average pension incomes in the City of London are almost three times larger than those in Stoke, analysis by Royal London has found.
Friday 6th April 2018
Open-access content
2

One in five Brits to work till they drop

One-fifth of UK adults believe they will work until they are physically unable to, while one in twenty expect to be working all their lives, new research has found.
Thursday 5th April 2018
Open-access content

Latest from no_opening_image

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
ta

IFoA adjudication panel: Mr Jack Wicks, student

On 30 October 2019 the Adjudication Panel considered an allegation of misconduct against Mr Jack Wicks (the respondent).
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from inline_local_link

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Manager - Building new team!

London (Central)
Up to £130k + Bonus
Reference
148845

Shape the Future of Credit Risk Model Development

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ six figure salary with excellent bonus potential + package
Reference
148843

Longevity Director

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ six figure salary with excellent bonus potential + package
Reference
148842
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ