Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • August 2017
08

Paying LPI service to market prices

Open-access content Monday 7th August 2017 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Robin Thompson and Andrew Kenyon look at how liabilities linked to Limited Price Indexation can create risk


Liabilities linked to Limited Price Indexation (LPI) are common in pension schemes, as well as being transferred to insurance companies in increasing volume via the bulk annuity market. 

LPI presents a risk management challenge, though, because of increasing constraints in the supply of LPI-linked assets.

With limited LPI-linked debt issuance and all but a very small number of banks having withdrawn from the LPI swap market, this is particularly concerning for insurers needing to minimise their Solvency II capital requirements levied against asset-liability mismatches, where capital consumption can be a key distinguishing factor in the competitiveness of new business pricing.


Market dynamics 

The LPI spread to RPI - reflecting the 'premium' paid to acquire the cap/floor - implies that the underlying RPI distribution exhibits a strong negative skew, that is, a higher probability of extreme deflationary events than extreme inflationary events. Whilst historic RPI analysis does exhibit some skew - largely driven by events in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis - it is far less pronounced than LPI pricing might imply, suggesting that demand for the floor (or lack of supply) has driven prices upward.

Since 2012 (post the Consumer Prices Advisory Committee's consultation which rejected proposed changes to the calculation method for RPI), spreads have widened every year since 2013, corresponding directly with the perceived reduction in market liquidity:

Chart 1


Risk management

Some exposures - like property market prices - can only be managed by proxy due to the lack of a functioning market in appropriate 

hedging instruments. For LPI, though, it is possible to trade RPI in a liquid swaps market or through (predominantly government-issued) RPI-linked bonds.

For many, 'delta hedging' LPI exposures using a combination of fixed-rate and inflation-linked instruments has become the natural substitute for scarce LPI-linked assets, making reference to an appropriate 'real-world' inflation model in the absence of a functioning market to mark-to.

In a functioning market, these delta values can be derived from market prices. If a liquid market does not exist, an appropriate 'real-world' model is required to allow us to delta-hedge our exposures.

Chart 2


Modelling considerations

Many pension schemes already make an adjustment to reduce their liabilities by removing the effect of skew - often using the Black-Scholes model to value LPI within their accounting and technical provisions bases. Adjustments like this result in a stronger balance sheet position, and some of those gains can be realised through the sale of existing LPI-linked hedging instruments:

Unlike market-consistent, risk-neutral valuations, real-world models require expert judgment to be employed in their calibration and use (see table 1). In particular:


  •  How much skew to retain
  •  Size of the distribution's tails
  •  Correlation between real and nominal interest rates
  •  Whether the model retains the ability to converge with market prices should liquidity improve
  •  Existence of a closed-form proxy to provide pricing/valuations quickly

 


Insurers may also want to be able to generate scenarios covering extreme and prolonged periods of high or low inflation when calibrating capital requirements.

Table 1



What is LPI?

LPI covers the class of indexation where increases/decreases are linked to RPI (Retail Price Indexation) but subject to a maximum (cap) and/or minimum (floor) amount. LPI(0,5) - 0% floor, 5% cap - LPI(0,3) and LPI(0,8) are all popular variants. Less frequently, the underlying inflation might be CPI.

In the early to mid-2000s, LPI supply was often derived from commercial property leases. The freeholder - often a company within a group set up purely to purchase premises leased to operating entities - made the assumption that rental income would increase in-line with RPI, subject to a cap and a floor. To increase certainty, these flows were swapped with a bank (often to receive fixed). 

In practice, though, reviews saw rents move in sympathy with market supply and demand dynamics, often with little correlation to inflation. Corporates found themselves without a natural stream of LPI cash flows to pay down their leg of the swap, combined with the 'perfect storm' of falling property prices and interest rates in the aftermath of the 2008 Financial Crisis.


Delta hedging

The 'delta' of a derivative is defined as the rate of change in the value of that derivative following a change in the value of the underlying instrument. For an equity option on a particular stock, the underlying would be the price of the stock. For LPI derivatives, the underlying is RPI.

Delta hedging refers to the process of constructing a portfolio of instruments so that the aggregate delta of the portfolio equals that of the derivative you are trying to replicate.

For a typical LPI(0,5) exposure, the actual indexation incurred is dependent on where RPI prints. At that point in time: If RPI < 0, no indexation occurs and the replicating portfolio needs to be made up of fixed income assets.

If 0 < RPI < 5, then liabilities inflate in-line with RPI, and the portfolio should be RPI-linked.

If RPI > 5, fixed indexation occurs at a rate of 5% per annum. Again, the portfolio needs to be made up of fixed income assets. In the time before the RPI print occurs, there is a chance the required indexation could be fixed or it could be in-line with RPI. The delta reflects this and requires us to allocate a portfolio that has a proportion of fixed and RPI-linked assets dependent on the distance from the bound and time to expiry. 




Dr Robin Thompson, NatWest Markets

Andrew Kenyon FIA, NatWest Markets

This article appeared in our August 2017 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

A nation divided?

Are there really differences in life expectancy between Scotland and the rest of the UK? If so, how should actuaries take account of these? Phil Caine and Susan Hanlon discuss
Monday 7th August 2017
Open-access content
2

Is de-risking in members' best interests?

Traditional asset-liability modelling for defined benefit pension schemes ignores covenant risk. Integrating this risk may suggest that a higher allocation to return-seeking assets makes sense, say Robert Waugh, Nic Barnes and Robert Chestnutt
Monday 7th August 2017
Open-access content
2

Mortality improvements in decline

Jon Palin, on behalf of the CMI Mortality Projections Committee, reviews the growing evidence for a slowing down of mortality improvements in the UK, noting the trend for pension scheme members is less clear
Monday 7th August 2017
Open-access content
2

Changing world health

Dr John Schoonbee talks to Gemma Gregson and Richard Purcell about reinventing dietary guidelines, e-cigarettes and advances in diagnostic techniques
Monday 7th August 2017
Open-access content
2

Perfecting proxy models

Shaun Lazzari and Oliver Bentley look at managing sources of inaccuracy in Least Squares Monte Carlo proxy model fitting
Tuesday 8th August 2017
Open-access content
2

Book review: Insurance in Elizabethan England

Insurance in Elizabethan England – The London Code Cambridge Studies in English Legal History
Tuesday 8th August 2017
Open-access content

Latest from August 2017

2

Government announces tough new measures to tackle pension cold calling

The UK government announced yesterday that it would ban cold calls and tighten protections against transfers to fraudulent schemes.
Friday 18th August 2017
Open-access content
2

British Steel Pension Scheme to separate from Tata Steel

The Pensions Regulator has today approved a proposal from Tata Steel UK (TSUK) to separate itself from the British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS), to avoid the company becoming insolvent.
Friday 11th August 2017
Open-access content

Erratic expectations

I was interested to learn from Alex Waite’s July article (bit.ly/AnimalSpiritsAW) there is an Economic Modelling Group aiming at improving forecasting of economic outcomes. I wish this the best of luck, but would not be surprised if the results prove inconclusive. Honorary fellows are eminent individuals in business, academia and government.
Tuesday 8th August 2017
Open-access content

Latest from no_opening_image

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
ta

IFoA adjudication panel: Mr Jack Wicks, student

On 30 October 2019 the Adjudication Panel considered an allegation of misconduct against Mr Jack Wicks (the respondent).
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 08

2

Fail to prepare

Fail to prepare
Tuesday 8th August 2017
Open-access content
2

Are you a pusher or a puller?

Ally Yates explains how to use the right strategy for the right situation when negotiating and influencing
Tuesday 8th August 2017
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Investment Consultant

Scotland / Scotland, Edinburgh / London, England
Up to £70000.00 per annum
Reference
148689

Market Risk Capital Actuary/Quant

London (Central)
£65,000 - £115,000 plus bonus and package
Reference
148688

Experience Analysis Contractor

England
Negotiable
Reference
148687
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ