Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2015
09

Dear Agony actuary

Open-access content Tuesday 1st September 2015 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Dear dear Agony actuary...

I find myself in something of a predicament because I understand that the Regulation Standards Board has released a new standard called "APS X2", which requires me to have my work peer reviewed.

The problem I face is that I am not sure which of my colleagues I trust with reviewing my work. I attach a list of my staff, together with a thumbnail sketch of each. I would appreciate your thoughts. Also, what do you think, is £140 per policy about right?

 

Yours

Name and address supplied

Agony aunt

Thank you for your letter. Now, I hope your closing question - "What do you think, is £140 per policy about right?" - is not a devious way of getting me to carry out your peer review for you. I have absolutely no way of telling whether this is the right price - I know nothing about your line of business.

Mind you, based upon your character sketches, I appear to know only a little less than many of your colleagues. For example, I can immediately rule out Wiggins, Maltravers and 'Dogface' as being appropriate peer reviewers. Wiggins' fondness for absinthe appears to render him unsuitable. And while your review need not be carried out by an actuary, I don't think Maltravers would be suitable as, from your brief description of him, he appears to be the man who mends the photocopier.

—

'Dogface' is unsuitable because he appears to be a figment of your fevered imagination.

Turning to Michael Spoonbender, would I be correct in deducing from your description of him as "a feckless young shaver" together with your description of what you term your "diverse acts of bravery and derring-do during the Crimean War" that there is something of an age gap between the two of you? In which case, you will have to consider whether Spoonbender is in a position to offer a meaningful challenge to you. Would he not be slightly intimidated in challenging the work of someone who is not only 150 years his senior but who also possesses such prowess with a bayonet?

Concerning Doris Francesca Wobblegoose, I would discount her as a peer review option simply on the basis that she died in 1942. It is of the essence that actuarial peer review must be done "hot", at a time when it is able to influence the outcome of the work involved. And I would advise against waiting until such time as cryogenics had advanced to the point where Ms Wobblegoose was in a fit state to carry out the work.

In fact, having looked through your 19 pages of analysis, diagrams, confused ramblings and sundry erotic sketches, I have concluded that none of your colleagues is in a position to peer review your work.

But this should not cause you to despair, as there are other options. First, you could resign from the actuarial profession and absolve yourself of the formal requirement for peer review. Although I would caution against this. Membership of the profession is a highly sought-after achievement as we are an extremely prestigious organisation with extraordinarily high levels of intellect. The concept of net present value is one that only actuaries, a handful of Nobel Prize winning economists and Professor Yaffle from Bagpuss have the mental capacity to fully grasp.

Perhaps the best advice I can offer is that you might look outside your organisation for your peer reviewer. 

Have you built up a professional network over the years? In one of your appendices you describe your time with 'Ye Venerational Dining Company of Ye Actuaries' in this way: "In the company of such luminaries as Cyril "Legs" Eggnog and Percival Cornelius Clutterbuck I have spent many a glorious evening eating with relish the inner organs of beasts and fowls. I like nutty gizzards, a stuffed roast heart and liver slices with crustcrumbs. Most of all, I like grilled mutton kidneys which give to my palate the full flavour of a heated Staple Inn debate."

Might Messrs Eggnog and Clutterbuck be pressed into APS X2 action?

Do let me know how you get on.


Kind regards

Agony actuary

This article appeared in our September 2015 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
09

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Manager - Employee Benefits

£2958.18 - £3549.82 per month
Reference
145973

Manager - Employee Benefits

£2958.18 - £3549.82 per month
Reference
145972

Portfolio Management/Business Planning Actuary

London (Central)
£100000 - £125000 per annum
Reference
145971
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ