Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2015
06

Lucky for some

Open-access content Monday 1st June 2015 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Darryl Boulton picks out some of the common examination pitfalls, and offers tips on maximising the best outcome for students

2

My first actuarial job was in a large life office with many students sitting exams. To make results day more exciting, I ran a little competition. You had to draw six names out of a hat and the person who collected the most passes was the winner. What got people's attention though was the book I ran on who was going to win the competition.

I needed to assess the chances of each individual passing their exams, which required a reasonable amount of research and judgment. After a couple of days I nervously took a phone call from the chief actuary, fully expecting to be berated for not focusing all my efforts on product development. Happily though he was merely checking the latest odds. Even better, thanks to one chap unexpectedly passing both exams he sat, the winner was a 25/1 outsider no-one had backed. Happy days. But how much luck is involved in passing the exams?


Preparation

My advice for the later subjects is to go into the exam believing you can score 100%, come out thinking you have scored 75% or more, and you might scrape through with 50% or so, depending on how harshly the exam is marked. What you know is all too often not reflected by what you write.

Preparation is obviously key. You are very much trusting to luck if you prepare insufficiently well and enter the exam hoping a particular topic does not come up.

Did you sit a mock exam? And if so, did you do it under exam conditions? ActEd reports that an astonishingly high proportion of students do not attempt mock exams under timed exam conditions. Mocks are a golden opportunity to expose topics you thought you knew but actually are a little weak on, not to mention a useful way of getting used to the conditions you will face on exam day.


Bad habits

So you prepare well, get to the exam venue in good time, what can go wrong? Well, are you 'exam smart'? Take, for example, the following question: 'Explain why the running yield from property investments tends to be greater than that from equity investments.'

A number of students will begin their answer along the following lines. 'The running yield from property investments tends to be greater than that from equity investments for a number of reasons...' 20 words, score so far - zero! You have merely repeated the question back to the examiner and made a bland comment that reveals nothing of your knowledge. If you do this on every question you waste quite a lot of time. So answer the question directly, don't waste time repeating it.


The marking process

How much luck is involved in the marking process? The honest answer is that it will depend partly on the subject, but there is much less involved than students believe.

Every script is double-blind marked, so independently marked by two actuaries who will have no knowledge of the scores awarded by the other marker. The lead examiner will then do extensive analysis to ensure scores are standardised and that all anomalies are investigated. Third, and sometimes even fourth, marking will be applied to borderline scripts. The later subjects require more judgment from the examiners when awarding marks. They also see a greater bunching of marks. The best candidates will pass, the worst will fail. You may perhaps be unlucky if you are in the middle, but it is clear that the better you prepare, the less luck you will need.

There has been much criticism of CA3 in the pages of this magazine, indeed it has been likened to a lottery. Owing to the very nature of this subject it can produce very different marks from different examiners and perhaps has the largest degree of luck involved in the marking process. However, it is often students' (lack of) preparation that gives them a similar chance of passing as of winning the lottery. 

There are some naturals at communication and they pass easily, but too many students do not prepare thoroughly for this exam and can have no complaints at the low pass rate. Marking CA3 will never be an exact science and, yes, some students may be luckier than others. However, the examiners work very hard to provide consistent and fair analysis.

Best of luck to everyone waiting for the all-important pass or fail. However, should results not go your way, then the chances are you will find the reason by looking in the mirror. 

Darryl Boulton is an independent actuarial consultant 
This article appeared in our June 2015 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

An ethical question

Peter Crowley explains why interest rate derivative mis-selling is a continuing problem
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
ta

The evolution of ERM

Paul Harwood considers enterprise risk management and discusses how to optimise the second generation of this method and make the right choices
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
2

A roadworthy model

The new regulatory framework requires firms who develop their own internal capital models to have these validated. William Diffey and Apollos Dan look at the key challenges, and suggest the best route for a good test run
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
2

The consumers' champion

Ros Altmann talks to Richard Purcell about understanding consumers’ concerns, and her priorities as the UK government’s newly appointed pensions minister
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
2

Carbon Risk: how do we measure and manage it?

We have reached a turning point in taking account of carbon risk, says Lauren Smart, and if managed properly, this could have positive results for pension funds and insurers
Tuesday 2nd June 2015
Open-access content
2

PRA sets out expectations of internal models for Solvency II

The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) has set out draft proposals covering the use of internal and partial internal models to calculate solvency capital requirement (SCR).
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content

Latest from June 2015

Drought © Shutterstock

Government 'must act now' to tackle climate change risk

The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has urged the UK government to act now to reduce carbon emissions and tackle climate change.
Tuesday 30th June 2015
Open-access content

NEST's blueprint combines drawdown, lump sum and annuity

The National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) has created a retirement strategy blueprint that features a combination of an income drawdown, a cash lump sum and a later-life annuity.
Tuesday 30th June 2015
Open-access content
2

Life insurers report first increase in profits in nine months

Life insurers have reported their first increase in profits since September 2014 and confidence for firms continues to rise, said PwC.
Monday 29th June 2015
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Exposure Management Analyst

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
148639

Pricing - Casualty Actuary

London (Central)
£128K + bonus + benefits
Reference
148638

Reporting Contractor

Negotiable
Reference
148636
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ