Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2015
06

An ethical question

Open-access content Monday 1st June 2015 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Peter Crowley explains why interest rate derivative mis-selling is a continuing problem

2

Interest rate derivative or 'swap' mis-selling continues to make the news, both in the UK and abroad - a quick Google search gives many examples. Despite a redress programme from the Financial Conduct Authority, the controversy continues - replacing a swap with a smaller, or shorter term, variant appears to continue to cause resentment. But what is the problem with these products?

In essence, banks heavily sold them with a great focus on the cash flow effects (interest rate risks), but ignoring the market risk. The capital position was only described as a break cost if a client wanted to exit the contract in unfavourable circumstances. The fact that the derivative could or might be used to assess a break in the loan covenant was not discussed in the sale process. The market risk extracted from the client was used by the bank to book a profit.

Products were designed to increase capital value (and also risk) in the event of a recession (and falls in base rate). When the market risk crystallised, the loans that the swaps were sold to 'protect' rendered the overall package unsafe to the bank. The banks were then under pressure to recall the loans. The gap between technical (legal) insolvency for the borrower and inadequacy as a banking loan (plus derivative) covenant is quite wide - this was addressed by using units such as RBS's 'Global Recovery Group', which imposed substantial charges and restrictions. The derivatives in the books meant that it was practically impossible to refinance, so the borrowers were totally at the banks' mercy. Crystallisation of credit risk was cited as the reason.


Not-so-simple measures

Much has been made of products sold that were 'too complicated'- but every product can be separated out into its component interest rate floors and caps. Each of these can be considered separately in the light of various risks and benefits described under Basel II. The book Risk Management and Shareholder Value in Banking by Resti and Seroni gives good descriptions of the four key risks: interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk and operational risk - from both borrowers' and lenders' points of view.

Apparently, the former FSA agreed a maximum upfront profit of 0.2% of the loan per year - but such a simple measure disguises the risks of the product being sold. Around 90% of the products sold were 'simple' swaps - but, counter-intuitively, swaps can be more risky than 'complicated' products, owing to their higher volatility.

Details of the agreement between banks and the regulator regarding the redress process were not made public until the end of 2014. Much was made of whether 'the customer expressed a desire for interest rate protection'. Bearing in mind that the derivatives were sold to appear as part of the underwriting process of variable rate loans, (for which the risk was interest rate rises), and borrowers would be keen to appear prudent in a loan underwriting process, eliciting such an interest from a borrower cannot have been difficult. Emails, slides, and anecdotal evidence suggest that this was done.

Far from helping to manage interest rate changes, the derivatives sold made those risks unmanageable. When the recession, already priced into the forward curve, crystallised at the end of 2008, businesses, and, of course, the banks themselves, sustained substantial damage.

The 'swap for a swap' redress agreement has effectively legitimised derivative sales (and their financial cousins - fixed-rate loans with forward-curve-based break costs) through the back door. A continued selling of loan finance with risks deliberately concealed cannot be either ethical or for the long-term general economic good, irrespective of the legal determinations when an increasing number of cases come to court.

Clearly, there are good counter-arguments to this, and they include consideration of the qualities of gilts, debentures, and peer-to-peer funders, most of whose loans are at fixed rates. Mine is a single view, and I welcome disagreement and contributions to a debate that actuaries can considerably inform.

Peter Crowley is an independent actuary. His views represent neither those of the profession nor the profession's Banking Member Interest Group
This article appeared in our June 2015 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

The consumers' champion

Ros Altmann talks to Richard Purcell about understanding consumers’ concerns, and her priorities as the UK government’s newly appointed pensions minister
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
2

Pension funds invested in Chinese property could face 'choppy waves'

Pension funds involved in Chinese real estate investment may see disruptions, an event was told.
Thursday 4th June 2015
Open-access content
2

Lifestyle pension funds lose 9% of value

Lifestyle pension funds have lost 9% of their value in four months and things “could get worse”.
Friday 26th June 2015
Open-access content
2

DB pension liability hedge hits £657bn

Liability driven investment (LDI) continues to “grow significantly” in the UK with hedged liabilities increasing by 29% to £657bn last year, according to a report by KPMG.
Monday 29th June 2015
Open-access content
2

Lucky for some

Darryl Boulton picks out some of the common examination pitfalls, and offers tips on maximising the best outcome for students
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
ta

The evolution of ERM

Paul Harwood considers enterprise risk management and discusses how to optimise the second generation of this method and make the right choices
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content

Latest from Investment

KV

Liability-driven investments: new landscape

What now for liability-driven investments, after last year’s crash in the market? Pensions experts Rakesh Girdharlal and Moiz Khan say it should lead to a more balanced approach
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
cj

Natural capital investing

Chris Howells and Andrew Dreaneen discuss how today’s investments in natural capital profit portfolios as well as the planet and humanity
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
t

Options open on making portfolios more climate-friendly

Michael Sher sets out the option savailable to investors who are looking to improve their portfolios’ climate credentials
Wednesday 2nd November 2022
Open-access content

Latest from Position

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
2

Expert advice

This edition of the magazine focuses on data science and its applications, which will be a recurring theme for the IFoA.
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content
2

Tesla sparks fears of insurance market overhaul

That is according to a new report from Moody's, which highlights how Tesla has already started offering premiums that are up to 30% cheaper than those of mainstream insurers.
Friday 14th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from June 2015

Drought © Shutterstock

Government 'must act now' to tackle climate change risk

The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has urged the UK government to act now to reduce carbon emissions and tackle climate change.
Tuesday 30th June 2015
Open-access content

NEST's blueprint combines drawdown, lump sum and annuity

The National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) has created a retirement strategy blueprint that features a combination of an income drawdown, a cash lump sum and a later-life annuity.
Tuesday 30th June 2015
Open-access content
2

Life insurers report first increase in profits in nine months

Life insurers have reported their first increase in profits since September 2014 and confidence for firms continues to rise, said PwC.
Monday 29th June 2015
Open-access content

Latest from 06

2

Carbon Risk: how do we measure and manage it?

We have reached a turning point in taking account of carbon risk, says Lauren Smart, and if managed properly, this could have positive results for pension funds and insurers
Tuesday 2nd June 2015
Open-access content
2

A roadworthy model

The new regulatory framework requires firms who develop their own internal capital models to have these validated. William Diffey and Apollos Dan look at the key challenges, and suggest the best route for a good test run
Monday 1st June 2015
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Exposure Management Analyst

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
148639

Pricing - Casualty Actuary

London (Central)
£128K + bonus + benefits
Reference
148638

Reporting Contractor

Negotiable
Reference
148636
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ