Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • July 2014
07

Curved time

Open-access content Thursday 26th June 2014 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

David Blake and John Pickles examine how our preference for time influences the way we value investments

2

How much will a £1 investment be worth in 30 years' time? And what is that future value worth today? Actuaries are used to pondering such questions, so we're interested in how your clients might answer them. As we'll explain, we suspect that their answer to the second question might not always be £1. It might be more, it might be less. 

In our paper, Value-time curve psychology, we consider a series of 'thought investments' in which the initial value of an investment is projected forward to a future date (prospection) and that future value is discounted back (retrospection) to give a present value. We use 'value-time charts' to trace this mental simulation of changing value over time. 

We show that the first big distinction is between those who value 'exponentially' and those who value 'hyperbolically'. Exponential valuation is standard in time value of money calculations where annual growth rates are assumed to be constant over time. But, in reality, many of us value hyperbolically, anticipating that £1 invested will grow more rapidly in the short-term than in the long-term.

In Chart 1 (below), £1 is projected forward 30 years: exponentially to £5.74 and hyperbolically to £3.32. In this example, the exponential investor is assuming a fixed annual growth rate of 6%. In contrast, the hyperbolic investor initially expects that the investment will grow at a much higher annual rate than 6%. But as the hyperbolic investor looks further into the future, he or she anticipates that the annual return will fall well below 6% and that the average annual return will be just 4%. 

We show the next big distinction is between those who value 'symmetrically', those who value 'myopically' and those who value 'hyperopically'. Traditionally, 'symmetry' has been assumed between prospection and retrospection. An important implication of symmetry is 'temporal neutrality'. In other words, an investor who is temporally neutral has no time preference, that is, no preference for the past, the present or the future. Temporal neutrality, in a thought investment, means the present value always equals the initial value. 

If £1 is compounded forward, at 6% for 30 years, then a symmetric investor will use a 6% discount rate to arrive back at a present value of £1. 

As Chart 2 illustrates, a symmetric investor values at £1 today £1 invested in any asset for any period of time. So, the present value of £1 invested in equities for, say, 35 years with an assumed return of 8% p.a. is the same as £1 invested in bonds for, say, 20 years with an assumed return of 4% p.a., namely £1, even though equities are riskier, offer a higher expected return and are held for a longer period than bonds. In other words, for a symmetric investor £1 worth of equities has the same present value as £1 worth of bonds. 

Recent research in behavioural psychology, however, reveals that the ways in which many of us mentally represent the future and the past differ. Prospection differs, in context and experience, from retrospection. Many of us are not temporally neutral. Some of us are 'myopic' and have 'positive time preference': we value the present more than the future. Some of us, in contrast, are 'hyperopic', we value the future over the present: we have 'negative time preference'. 

Positive time preference, in a thought investment, implies that the present value is less than the initial value. Chart 3 illustrates the myopic investor's value-time curves. 

When valuing exponentially, £1 today is valued at £5.74 in 30 years' time; and £5.74 in 30 years' time at £0.57 today. When valuing hyperbolically, £1 today is projected to grow to £3.32 in 30 years' time and that future value is then discounted to a present value of £0.57. 

By implication, £1 today invested for 30 years is valued at £0.57. In this example, the myopic exponential investor and the myopic hyperbolic investor both happen to give this particular investment the same present value of £0.57, even though the mental time travel journeys each investor took to reach the same present value are very different. In general, we would not expect such different journeys to lead to the same present value. In reality, we would expect the different mental time travel journeys that investors take to lead to a whole range of different present values.

In a thought investment with negative time preference, present value exceeds initial value. Chart 4 shows the hyperopic investor's value-time curves, both when valuing exponentially and hyperbolically. £1 is projected forward exponentially to £5.74 in 30 years' time and then exponentially discounted to a present value of £1.77. And, £1 today is projected hyperbolically to £3.32 and then hyperbolically discounted to £1.77. By implication, £1 today invested for 30 years is valued at £1.77 for these two hyperopic investors, although this need not be the case in general.

We explore, in our paper, the reasons why investors might project and discount non-symmetrically. One reason is their attitude to risk. We explain, for example, why a risk-averse investor might value £1 invested in equities at less than £1 invested in bonds whereas a risk-seeking investor might attribute a higher value to the equities.

Our paper is theoretical, albeit referenced to a comprehensive body of experimental evidence. Our next task is to carry out our own testing. As a first step, we would much appreciate your feedback. In particular, do you recognise, or have any anecdotal evidence of 'symmetric', 'myopic' and 'hyperopic' valuation? Certainly, some traditional actuaries appear to have valued equities hyperopically: they could quite happily switch a pension fund's bonds, valued at £100m, into equities and value the equities at £120m. Presumably this no longer happens?

Curved time graphs

Please download the report at bit.ly/T34juD and then email your comments to [email protected]

This article appeared in our July 2014 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Singapore

Why Singapore? Why Now?
Tuesday 1st July 2014
Open-access content
2

Neeharika Prasad

Neeharika currently lives in Sydney, working at Ernst & Young in the banking and capital markets team within actuarial services. She has spent most of her life in Canberra where she studied for her exams at the Australian National University. She is a member of the Actuaries Institute (Australia).
Tuesday 1st July 2014
Open-access content
2

Adhnan Chaudhry

Adhnan was born and grew up in Edinburgh. He currently works for Ernst & Young in the general insurance sector specialising in reserving, capital modelling and Solvency II. He describes himself as sporty, enjoying climbing, and more recently scuba diving with friends. He is a member of the IF0A.
Tuesday 1st July 2014
Open-access content
2

Luiz Bueno

Luiz was born and raised in São Paulo. He works as a life and health products actuary for Swiss Re. In 2013 he completed an MSc in Actuarial Science at Cass Business School, London. His interests include Portuguese and Brazilian literature, and good movies. He is a member of the IFoA.
Thursday 3rd July 2014
Open-access content
2

Eastern promise

Faisal Zai examines how Islamic Takaful insurance is growing as the burgeoning economies of MINT countries begin to make their mark
Thursday 26th June 2014
Open-access content
2

Foot on the ladder

Jenni Hughes provides an overview of the Certified Actuarial Analyst (CAA) qualification as it continues to attract global interest
Thursday 26th June 2014
Open-access content

Latest from Investment

KV

Liability-driven investments: new landscape

What now for liability-driven investments, after last year’s crash in the market? Pensions experts Rakesh Girdharlal and Moiz Khan say it should lead to a more balanced approach
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
cj

Natural capital investing

Chris Howells and Andrew Dreaneen discuss how today’s investments in natural capital profit portfolios as well as the planet and humanity
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
t

Options open on making portfolios more climate-friendly

Michael Sher sets out the option savailable to investors who are looking to improve their portfolios’ climate credentials
Wednesday 2nd November 2022
Open-access content

Latest from July 2014

Independent DC audit panel issues progress report

The independent panel convened to probe the defined contribution pensions market has confirmed it will review all workplace pensions sold before 2001 and all post-2001 DC plans sold with fees over 1% per annum.
Thursday 31st July 2014
Open-access content

Towers Watson: value of 'at-retirement' market set to hit £50bn

The UK ‘at retirement’ market will triple to £50bn by 2023, pushed by substantial annuity sales, according to analysis by Towers Watson.
Friday 25th July 2014
Open-access content

IFoA and FRC issue statement on actuarial standards

The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) and the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) have issued a joint statement on actuarial standards.
Thursday 24th July 2014
Open-access content

Latest from inline_local_link

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 07

2

Going Global with Insurance Capital Standards

Earlier this year, The Actuarial Association of Europe (formerly the Group Consultatif) held a seminar in Brussels entitled ‘The New Global Insurance Capital Standard’. David Beddows and Ad Kok share their thoughts, inspired by the presentations and lively discussions that took place
Monday 14th July 2014
Open-access content
2

A tale of two countries

Why are banking systems unstable in some countries – but not in others? Charles Calomiris and Stephen Haber use the examples of the United States and Canada to reveal how a mix of politicians, bankers and other interest groups make financial crises more likely to occur
Monday 14th July 2014
Open-access content
2

Besijana Mati

Besijana works at PricewaterhouseCoopers in Toronto, Canada. She is an avid long-distance runner and enjoys competing in trail running races. Another passion is playing classical music on the piano. Besijana speaks four languages and so favours watching foreign films, with her close circle of friends.
Thursday 3rd July 2014
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Exposure Management Analyst

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
148639

Pricing - Casualty Actuary

London (Central)
£128K + bonus + benefits
Reference
148638

Reporting Contractor

Negotiable
Reference
148636
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ