Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2013
09

Pensions: The right balance

Open-access content Thursday 12th September 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

An intelligent asset rebalancing strategy can help to reduce pension scheme risk. George Tyrakis discusses the possible approaches – and potential pitfalls

2

—

Traditionally pension schemes have maintained static asset allocations, where the portfolio is allocated across a range of asset classes in line with the scheme's risk budget. As asset values fluctuate, the asset portfolio requires rebalancing to ensure the desired portfolio weights are maintained. Naturally, a number of questions arise. For example, at what frequency should the portfolio be rebalanced? What are acceptable limits for the portfolio weights to deviate from the initial allocations? Is a fixed asset allocation suitable for the scheme at future dates?

Using an Asset-Liability Model with a suitably calibrated Stochastic Economic Scenario Generator (ESG), the assets and liabilities of the scheme have been projected stochastically over future periods. The yield curves used to discount the liabilities were produced in the ESG and these were also used to drive returns on fixed income assets. Real-world correlations between various asset classes were modelled together with the realistic dynamics of the assets held, such as equity market jumps and time-varying equity volatility. For the purposes of this exercise, longevity risk was not modelled so as to focus the analysis on market risks and how these impact the assets and liabilities. The asset portfolio used is shown in Table 1.

Figure 2 pensions

Possible outcomes

The range of possible funding level outcomes over the time horizon can be illustrated using a probability distribution funnel generated using Monte Carlo simulation.

In Figure 2, assets are rebalanced on a monthly basis using the initial allocation as a target benchmark. This can be thought of as 'strategy neutral' because the asset allocation is mechanically rebalanced on a passive basis.

Consider revising the asset portfolio rebalancing strategy, so that the target asset allocation changes as the funding level of the scheme moves into different ranges as shown in Figure 3.

If the funding level breaches any of the conditions shown above, from above or from below, the asset portfolio is rebalanced accordingly. Under this strategy, the initial asset allocation (shown in the Funding Level <85% column of Figure 3) requires a small increase in UK equities to in order to off set some of the lost return due to de-risking so as to ensure that the scheme's target of achieving return due to de-risking so as to ensure that the scheme's target of achieving 100% funding in three years is attained on average.

Table 1 pensions

? Probability of Success, defined as the probability of being at least fully funded over the three years, is relatively unchanged under both strategies given both strategies target and achieve a median funding level of 100% at the end of three years.

? Standard Deviation of funding level is reduced by 5% per annum.

? Conditional Expectation, defined as the expected funding level given the funding level is below 100% in year three, has increased by 2%, another desirable outcome.

? The potential deterioration of funding level over time is significantly reduced as can be seen by lower 1-in-200 Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall risk measures.

The above reduction in risk has come at the expense of reduced upside potential. The gradual risk reduction rebalancing strategy is effectively reducing the overall riskiness of the asset-liability position, and therefore its return potential. Despite this, a more closely matched asset-liability position over time would be desirable from a funding perspective, as it would increase the probability of achieving the investment objective, which has previously been illustrated (Puchy, 2012).

Table 2 pensions
The above reduction in risk has come at the expense of reduced upside potential. The gradual risk reduction rebalancing strategy is effectively reducing the overall riskiness of the asset-liability position, and therefore its return potential. Despite this, a more closely matched asset-liability position over time would be desirable from a funding perspective, as it would increase the probability of achieving the investment objective, which has previously been illustrated (Puchy, 2012).
Figure 3 pensions
Refinements of the above strategy are, possible: for example, one may wish to incorporate economic triggers into the strategy, such as to initiate de-risking once long-term interest rates rise above 4% or smart beta strategies such as volatility control. The inclusion of leverage effects in the presence of derivatives such as swaps or futures can also be incorporated in similar analysis.
Figure 4 pensions

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Puchy, R. (2012, October). Barrie & Hibbert.

http://www.barrhibb.com/documents/downloads/Does_monitoring_of_a_DB_pension_schemes_funding_levels_really_matter.pdf

 

R. C. Urwin, S. J. (2001). Risk Budgeting in PensionInvestment. British Actuarial Journal, 319-364.

This article appeared in our September 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
09
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Calling all GI Actuaries looking to move into contracting

England, London
£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
146169

A chance to gain capital modelling experience.

London, England
£70000 - £110000 per annum
Reference
146168

Capital Contractor GI

England, London
£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
146166
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ