Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2013
06

Dust in a drawer?

Open-access content Friday 7th June 2013 — updated 11.15am, Tuesday 5th May 2020

Jean-Pierre Charmaille and Rachel Elwell look at the importance of keeping your pension scheme risk register alive

Risk registers occupy a central place in pension scheme management, more so than in other businesses, perhaps as they have long been the risk management tool of choice for trustees and their advisors.  They are the blueprint by which schemes are run: identifying the risks faced, describing the controls to prevent, mitigate or give early warning of risks and setting out the control owners.  The risks are commonly assessed in terms of their impact and likelihood, with a separate assessment of the effectiveness of controls to give the residual risk after mitigation.

The process by which trustees develop their risk register is in itself very valuable. It improves trustees' understanding of their scheme, its strengths and weaknesses, and encourages challenge of advisors.  However, once the risk register has been fully developed, it often ceases to be a live document that trustees pay attention to. Why is this so often the case?

The cycle of risk management

The creation of a risk register is only one part of the cycle of risk management and often the rest of the risk management strategy can be easily overlooked.  The risk management strategy brings a risk register to life, where trustees will assess risk appetite and risk budget, and prioritise risk mitigation actions, and which then becomes a tool to manage progress against the strategy.

Flow Chart 1

Identification of risks

There are a number of different ways to populate the risk register:


•    Pro forma lists covering core risks for a "standard" scheme.

•    Theoretical risk management frameworks suggest a number of different risk types which can be used to generate ideas (such as financial, operational, reputational, etc).

•    Brainstorming (or "Blue Sky" thinking) sessions can identify risks specific to a scheme's own objectives or around a specific topic.  The sponsoring employer may be able to contribute.

•    Lawyers and consultants prepare regular newsletters highlighting developments.

•    Scenario testing and reverse stress testing.

On this latter point, risk registers are often only a collection of things that can go wrong and interactions between risks are ignored.  But interactions between risks matter a lot. This is because pension schemes, like any organisations, are complex systems. For example, a reverse-stress-test exercise carried out by the Pension Protection Fund  showed that risks that were initially thought to have a small impact on the organisation had a much larger impact when interactions with other risks were taken into account.

The principle of reverse stress testing is to find scenarios that may render the business model of an organisation no longer viable. Unlike stress testing, reverse stress testing starts from the bad outcomes and seeks series of events that may lead to these outcomes. It is a risk management tool that can uncover weaknesses in the organisation control framework and focuses on the risks that may lead to a failure of the organisation.

Regular re-assessment

The cyclical nature of the risk framework is important: the environment in which schemes operate is constantly changing (eg. economic circumstances, regulations and legislation, demographics) and markets are constantly innovating to find new products to improve the efficiency of risk management (eg. longevity hedging instruments, speculation over CPI-linked gilts).  These need to feedback into the process to ensure that the prioritisation remains appropriate.  Potential questions include:

•    Are the risks identified still relevant to the scheme?

•    Are the controls as effective as we thought?

•    Are there new ways to mitigate the risks or to improve the risk-return profile?

•    Are there new emerging risks owing to changes in the scheme, pension industry or the wider economic environment?

•    Are the trustees spending their time considering the prioritised risks (if not, this might be an indication that the prioritisation is not quite right)?

Pension schemes can benefit from Enterprise Risk Management in the same way as all businesses.  Conscious identification of key priorities and risks, and a framework for improvement, will increase trustee and advisor engagement and should provide better member outcomes.

If the risk register has been embedded in the running of the scheme, it becomes the living and breathing document that enables prioritisation of activities and efficient spend of budget.  This requires commitment from all involved, but the reward when it works should mean no more dusty old registers.


Jean-Pierre Charmaille is the chief risk officer at the Pension Protection Fund.  Rachel Elwell is director of staff pensions at Royal London Group. Both sit on the Profession's ERM Research and Thought Leadership Committee.

This article appeared in our June 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
06
Topics
Risk & ERM

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

New Fast-Growing Team - Actuarial Systems Development

London (Greater)
Excellent Salary Package
Reference
143762

Actuarial Pension Consultant – Scotland/Remote – Up to £90,000 plus bonus

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £90,000 + Bonus
Reference
143761

Part Qualified Pensions Actuary– Specialised Pensions Consultancy - Scotland/Remote - Up to £70,000

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £70,000 + Bonus
Reference
143760
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ