Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2013
06

Reinsurance uncovered

Open-access content Tuesday 4th June 2013 — updated 9.18am, Tuesday 5th May 2020

Can we learn from Solvency II to unlock the hidden value of reinsurance for long-tail business? Victoria Jenkins and Jessica Leong report

Reinsurance on a long-tail business such as casualty provides lasting capital benefits until the complete run-off of the underlying business. It reduces not only underwriting risk but also the future reserve risk for that book of business. Yet how many companies are truly considering this multi-year capital relief in their reinsurance decision-making?

—

Compared with the current individual capital assessment (ICA) regime, Solvency II's one-year risk horizon has the potential to draw attention away from multi-year risk. The complexity of creating a comprehensive multi-year capital model means that many companies are not focusing on the multi-year risk of long-tail business when considering their reinsurance strategy.

Reinsurance strategy decisions are often evaluated by assessing the change in economic value between the current reinsurance programme and alternative options. We define the economic value of a strategy as the difference between the expected return and the cost of servicing the risk capital required to support the strategy:

economic value = net underwriting profit - (net capital required x cost of capital).


Long-term view

The difference between the economic value of the current strategy and an alternative strategy is the economic value added (EVA). A positive EVA can be thought of as an improvement on the current strategy.

Typically, EVA only considers the capital savings over a one-year horizon - that is, the economic value formula looks at the reduction in the required underwriting risk capital over the next year only. For short-tail property classes of business, this is often a reasonable assumption, especially for catastrophe business.

From an economic capital modeling perspective, as soon as the most recent accident or underwriting year has elapsed, the risk transforms from contributing to underwriting risk and drops into the reserve risk bucket until it has completely run off. So, for casualty reinsurance, we believe that the economic value calculation should include the multi-year reduction in future reserve risk that the reinsurance provides. We call this reserve value added (RVA). If RVA is ignored, suboptimal strategies could be chosen.

Calculating RVA exactly requires a complex, multi-year capital model and reserve risk model. However, we advocate a simpler approach. While Solvency II can potentially draw attention away from the multi-year view through its one-year horizon, its approach to calculating the risk margin can provide a sound framework for calculating RVA since it measures the cost of the capital required to back a book of liabilities over the entire run-off. We can use this to determine the savings in capital cost from ceding a portion of the liabilities.

Graph 1

Step by step

The risk margin calculation requires you to:

? calculate the solvency capital requirement (SCR) at each future year to represent the capital needed to back liabilities until run-off;

? this capital has a cost of 6% above the risk-free rate;

? multiply the SCR at each point in time by the cost of capital;

? discount each year's capital cost back to Time = 0 at the risk-free rate;

? sum the discounted values.

A simplification often used in the risk margin calculation is to assume the capital required at each year end runs off in line with the payment pattern on the underlying claims. This method can be adapted to provide a straightforward way of assessing the multi-year capital benefit of reinsurance or RVA.

For a single accident year, calculate the reduction in underwriting risk capital provided by the reinsurance at time zero. Assume this runs off in line with the payment pattern for the losses covered by the reinsurance to reflect the reduction in reserve risk capital over the multi-year period. Calculate the cost of capital saved over all years and discount this back to time zero.

Aficionados of casualty business will recognise the simplifications of this approach. What we have looked at considers just a single accident year of loss as it runs off. The risk for casualty lines is that multiple accident years often deteriorate together.

It is important to think about casualty reinsurance as a consistent strategy across multiple accident years rather than a tactical year-on-year decision. This can reveal greater hidden value that the single accident year approach cannot.

Reserve deterioration is one of the most common causes of insolvency. Traditional reinsurance programmes can reduce this risk right from the start.

We conclude that although the RVA method is clearly not perfect, it can at least provide a starting point for assessing the multi-year capital benefit of reinsurance. In the words of Eleanor Roosevelt: "A little simplification would be the first step towards rational living, I think."


Victoria Jenkins is co-head and managing director of analytics for EMEA at Guy Carpenter and Jessica Leong is the lead casualty specialty actuary

The authors would like to thank Andrew Cox, head of advisory for EMEA at Guy Carpenter, for his help in writing this article

This article appeared in our June 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
06
Topics
Reinsurance

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

New Fast-Growing Team - Actuarial Systems Development

London (Greater)
Excellent Salary Package
Reference
143762

Actuarial Pension Consultant – Scotland/Remote – Up to £90,000 plus bonus

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £90,000 + Bonus
Reference
143761

Part Qualified Pensions Actuary– Specialised Pensions Consultancy - Scotland/Remote - Up to £70,000

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £70,000 + Bonus
Reference
143760
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ