Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2013
02

Modelling: The power of long memory

Open-access content Wednesday 6th February 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Faisal Zai explains how long-term memory methods can better explain extended periods of market depression compared with the standard econometric methods commonly in use today

2

Louis Bachelier is commonly known as the father of financial mathematics. In 1900 he came up with the idea of modelling stock prices using a random walk process or Brownian motion. Bachelier used this model to calculate the price of a barrier option 73 years before the famous Black Scholes option pricing formula.

Bachelier's work also predated Einstein's work on Brownian motion in 1905, when Einstein solved French physicist Joseph Fourier's renowned heat equation to come up with an equation for Brownian motion paths. Bachelier had worked out the distribution of the stochastic process underlying Brownian motion, called the Weiner process, but Einstein was unaware of Bachelier's work.

Brownian motion is an elegant representation of the stock market and the mathematics is well understood. However, the assumptions used to make Brownian motion work for stock returns are unrealistic to say the least. One of the most notorious of these assumptions is that successive stock market returns (log returns, generally) are independent and normally distributed. The stock market is thus assumed to have no memory, suggesting that a sharp decline one day will have no impact on stock market behaviour the following day. This is obviously wrong.

An important implication of this memoryless property is that stock market data can be scaled. Thus we can scale daily or monthly data characteristics to generate annual projections. This leads us to the ubiquitous 'square root of time' rule for scaling volatility. The argument implies that we can build 'reliable' estimates of return and volatility of annual returns by scaling up monthly, weekly or even daily data.

It wasn't until the pioneering work of Benoit Mandelbrot in the 1960s that people accepted that stock returns are not normally distributed and that stock markets and most asset return processes are not memoryless.

There have been many studies investigating the effect of short-term memory in asset returns, using standard linear auto-regressive time series models. Short-term memory means that the autocorrelation function, capturing the correlation between successive values in a time series, decays exponentially, and usually quickly, to zero. Figure 1 highlights the short-term memory that can be observed in absolute stock returns. Many fund managers use the existence of short-term memory to try to predict stock returns as part of their 'statistical arbitrage' trading tool kit. Consequently, short-term memory is now less prevalent in developed markets but persists in many developing markets.


Figure 1

When it comes to the standard short-term memory models, they are not quite good enough at explaining the dependence in asset returns. Take volatility clustering in asset returns - a feature that is widely seen even in developed stock market indices. This volatility structure indicates that asset returns are not independent. The absence of linear autocorrelations, as is the case for most developed markets, implies that the dependence must also be non-linear (see Figure 1). However, there is a debate as to whether this non-linear dependence is short- or long-term. Mandelbrot suggested that this non-linear dependence is long-term, but others have shown that it is short-term (Lo, 1991). Figure 2 shows how a stock price with long-term memory may appear. Nevertheless, hyperbolic autocorrelations seem to imply some long-term dependence. Standard generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models have exponential decay, and the general belief has been that these are unable to explain hyperbolic long-term decay when modelling absolute returns for instance (Maheu, 2002).


Figure 2

The intuition for long-term dependence came in the 1950s from the work of the British physicist Harold E Hurst, also known as Abu Nile or father of the Nile to the Egyptians. Hurst was asked to design a reservoir on the Nile so the dams could protect the Egyptians in time of flood and the reservoirs could be used in times of drought. Instead of assuming random and independent water discharge, as was common among hydrologists at the time, Hurst decided to study the Nile's flooding pattern by studying ancient records of the river dating back to the time of the Pharaohs.

Hurst found that the flooding patterns were neither random nor independent. They displayed a pattern where periods of high (low) discharges were followed by years of low (high) discharges - not dissimilar to the story of Joseph in the Old Testament and the Koran, when Egyptians were faced with seven years of plenty followed by seven years of drought. Hurst found that the standard econometric short-term memory models at the time did not provide a good fit to the 'Joseph effect' in the data. He eventually came up with the concept of long-term memory to explain these patterns. Hurst observed similar long-term memory in many other natural phenomena, such as the pattern followed by solar spots in our sun.

In the 1960s, Mandelbrot was teaching economics at Harvard and studying cotton prices. He also observed the presence of long-term dependence, similar to the pattern Hurst found in the Nile flooding. The connection was thus made to finance and Mandelbrot explained that times of market exuberance were like floods, while times of market depression resembled droughts. He found the standard short-term dependence econometric models cannot explain the persistence of these periods of exuberance and depression attributed to the decay process.

Research has found the presence of long-term dependence in many asset classes since the seminal work by Mandelbrot. The dependence is particularly significant in emerging stock markets. There are statistical tests to check the presence of long-term memory. One test checks the value of the so-called differencing parameter in the fitted autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model, while another calculates the value for the Hurst exponent of the data series using a modified version of the original analysis by Hurst discussed above. Carlos Leon and Alejandro Reviez (BIS, No 58) used these measures to test a wide range of asset classes and found the presence of long-term dependence in emerging markets, which are an important asset class for most equity managers.

So what are the implications for non-linear dependence in asset returns? They are profound. All the concepts in 'orthodox' finance are wrong if there is any form of dependence, whether it is linear or non-linear, short or long. For example, the Efficient Market Hypothesis, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (which derives all its assumptions from the Markowitz mean variance model) and the Black Scholes model are all invalid. Of course, this is not such a massive shock to the system now as it was when Mandelbrot first proposed these ideas.

The prevalence of long-term memory in many natural phenomena and in some asset returns highlights the importance of non-linear risk. Traders with short-term trading horizons and those using technical charts focus mainly on short-term memory. However, long-term memory can also be used to build optimal trading strategies. Understanding non-linear dependence, particularly long-term dependence, is vitally important for actuaries who manage not only long-term financial risk but also long-term non-financial risks, such as longevity. If we are to be at the forefront of risk management, we must take account of non-linear dependence, particularly long-term dependence, in the same way that Harold Hurst did when building the reservoir for the Nile.

Faisal Zai is a founding principal and quantative specialist at Peraspera Consulting Ltd

This article appeared in our February 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
02
Topics:
Investment

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ