Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2012
11

There's more to life than Solvency II

Open-access content Wednesday 31st October 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Insurers should avoid Solvency II myopia, argues Paul Fulcher, and be aware of wider regulatory developments that could have a greater effect and present significant opportunities

Insurers have in recent years focused their attention, and lobbying, on Solvency II. But Solvency II myopia may lead insurers to overlook a raft of other major reforms that could have an even greater effect.

Examples include the Dodd-Frank reforms in the US, Basel III rules for banks, and new European Market Infrastructure Regulation. In contrast to Solvency II, which was designed for a pre-global financial crisis world of much more stable markets, these arise directly from the response of regulators and politicians to the crisis. But that's another story!

In some cases, insurers will be affected directly. Large insurers, in particular, are fighting to avoid being designated as 'systemically important financial institutions' - likely to transmit or amplify shocks around the financial system - which would subject them to many of the same restrictions as banks.

One example is the move to central clearing of over-the-counter derivatives, discussed in the May 2012 edition of The Actuary.

Another is the UK government's proposals following Sir John Vickers' Independent Commission on Banking. These centre on a requirement for banks to ring-fence their retail operations, prohibiting them from engaging in many investment banking activities. A ring-fenced bank is also required to limit exposure to all insurance companies, other than the smallest friendly societies. If investment banking is seen as a casino, it seems that the government sees insurers as professional gamblers.

—

Even where insurers are not directly affected, the wider macro-economic impact of banking reform will have a significant effect on the economy and on asset markets.

One key area of opportunity for insurers arises from 'deleveraging' in the European banking sector - reducing the relative size of their assets and lending versus their capital base. Table 1 summarises the pressures on banks' balance sheets, and their responses.

We expect these pressures to lead to a substantial reduction in leverage ratios, as measured by the total assets owned by banks relative to their Tier 1 capital. Figure 1 shows the International Monetary Fund's estimate of the amount and source of the reduction in this ratio across the largest 58 EU banks over the period from 2011 to end-2013.

Table 1

The largest contribution comes from retaining earnings, rather than distributing them to shareholders and staff. This will enable banks to build up their capital buffers over the next few years, and avoid fire-sales of assets. However, they will continue to face pressures on funding these legacy portfolios.

Asset sales also play a major part, and the IMF estimates that these EU banks will reduce their balance sheets by a total of €2trn (£1.6trn) by the end of 2013. Only a quarter of this reduction is expected to come from reduced lending, with most from outright sales.

By the nature of their liabilities, insurers typically have a lower and more stable cost of funding than banks, and less need for immediate liquidity. They are therefore natural seekers of long-dated secure assets and, in a world where core sovereign bonds have negative real or even negative nominal yields, face a dearth of other opportunities.

Banks are likely to dispose of a range of assets, including: consumer loans; asset financing - infrastructure and project finance, and shipping and aviation loans; commercial real estate loans; residential mortgages; corporate loans; and asset-backed securities and structured credit.

Figure 2 shows analysis by Deloitte of 50 portfolio transactions that came to market in 2011. Each of these asset classes has distinct characteristics that insurers will need to understand and map to their needs, but in many cases they are secured on long-dated underlying assets, and fit more naturally in insurers' rather than banks' balance sheets.

However, insurers still face impediments.

  • Banks are able to carry many legacy assets at book-value and may be unwilling or unable to recognise market-value losses on a sale.
  • Other market participants may be more natural buyers - for example, local retail deposit banks in the US and Asia as EU banks exit these markets, and pension funds less affected by the regulatory issues discussed below.
  • Insurers will need to acquire the expertise to manage these different assets.
  • Insurers face an increased risk of being deemed systemically important if they are seen to engage in 'shadow-banking'.

Insurance regulation also provides an unexpected barrier. Solvency II, at least in its purest form, does not recognise the ability of insurers to buy and hold investments, and is instead based on the assumption that assets are liquidated at distressed prices after an extreme 1-in-200-year event. Basel III banking capital charges are typically lower than Solvency II, other than for isolated cases such as low loan-to-value residential mortgages or short-term credit card loans.

Legacy asset classes of banks are typically not in a suitable format for insurers, often being short-dated or pre-payable by the borrower at short notice and with limited penalties, and floating not fixed interest rates. In particular, they are often not eligible for the Solvency II matching adjustment.

Therefore, insurance company activity has primarily been focused in two areas.

  •  Liquidity swaps - providing near-term funding to banks secured on their legacy run-off assets, rather than buying assets outright.
  • Originating new lending - often with a bank, in a more insurer-friendly format.

Regulatory reforms from the global financial crisis represent both a threat and an opportunity for insurers, and actuaries should ensure they keep on top of developments. a


Learn more about bank deleveraging and central clearing at session A7, 'There's more to life than Solvency II', at the Life Conference and Exhibition, Brussels, on 4-6 November. Book online at www.eventsforce.net/tap/320/register

Untitled 4
Figure 2
This article appeared in our November 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
11

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

New Fast-Growing Team - Actuarial Systems Development

London (Greater)
Excellent Salary Package
Reference
143762

Actuarial Pension Consultant – Scotland/Remote – Up to £90,000 plus bonus

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £90,000 + Bonus
Reference
143761

Part Qualified Pensions Actuary– Specialised Pensions Consultancy - Scotland/Remote - Up to £70,000

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £70,000 + Bonus
Reference
143760
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ