Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • August 2012
08

Capital projections: Clear vision

Open-access content Wednesday 1st August 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

David Leach examines why life insurers are investing so heavily to boost their capital projections capability

2


The right amount of capital needs to be available at the right time for firms to take advantage of market opportunities and to avoid financial distress. Hold too much capital and returns will suffer; hold too little and business failure will have more damaging implications. It is essential for firms to have reliable, forward-looking information.

Projections are required under different conditions to understand how the capital position moves in potential adverse scenarios and to explore mitigating actions.

With Solvency II looming large, insurers are investing in their capabilities to project Solvency II and economic capital positions and to make their projection processes speedy and robust. A recent study found that 13 out of the 17 life insurers surveyed are intending to significantly change their capital projections approach or process during 2012/13.

The starting point

Before creating new or modifying existing projection capabilities, it is essential to have a clear idea of the questions that need answering. Projections fill the gap where time-zero stresses cannot provide sufficient insight - such as where there are complex interactions over time.

Examples of questions that projections can help to answer include:

  • Are current new business/growth plans affordable from available capital, or will new funding be required, and if so when?
  • Will the business continue to generate sufficient surplus cash to enable debt repayments to be made?
  • If a block of business is acquired, how will this affect the capital position and future dividend-paying capacity of the business?
  • What return on capital is expected?
  • In pricing new insurance contracts, how much capital should be allowed for over the lifetime of those policies, taking into account diversification between the risks in the new business and the other risks in the portfolio?
  • What risk margin do I need to hold in the Solvency II balance sheet, both now and over my business planning horizon?
  • How should bonuses be set so that it is possible to equitably distribute the estate of a closed with-profits fund?
  • How would all of the answers to the questions above differ under alternative economic conditions?
  • What types of conditions would cause the dividend strategy to be unsustainable?
  • Why is the current capital position different from what I expected it to be 12 months ago?


—

Chart 1 - Clear Vision

With answers to questions like these, decision-makers are better placed to take the right actions in areas that are commercially important.

Figure 1 shows the broad areas where capital projections are being used now and insurers' expectations for two years hence.

Providing clarity on what capital projections will be used for, and why, is critical in getting key stakeholders on board. As an added benefit, a number of companies are intending to provide projections in their internal model application process (IMAP) submission as supporting evidence for the use test - even if the projections are produced outside the internal model itself.

Planning and prioritisation

Defining uses naturally leads to prioritisation of requirements, which is an important step in developing a roadmap for projection capabilities. Clearly there are other important dimensions; for instance, technology and people, and the target operating model. Yet even the most basic plan can help to highlight what steps can safely be started in the short term without fear of wasted investment.

For many insurers the key challenges are:

  • To improve capability to project eligible own funds (regulatory capital resources).
  • To develop/improve capability to project capital requirements.

The effort required to project own funds should not be underestimated as this needs solid foundations. Moreover, own funds can be more sensitive to economic conditions than capital requirements.

Areas that need attention include consistency of asset and liability projections, treatment of derivatives, reinsurance, tax, and restrictions to own funds arising from ring-fencing and tiering.

Chart 2, clear vision

Capital requirements


For projection of capital requirements, there are a range of approaches, including:

  • The risk carrier approach.
  • The project and stress approach.
  • The full recalculation approach.

The risk carrier approach expresses future capital requirements as some function of time-zero capital requirements and one or more carriers, the value of which can be calculated in future time periods.

The project and stress approach involves the projection of assets and liabilities for a block of business to each future time period, whereupon a stress is applied and a capital amount is directly produced at each future point in time. This is computationally more demanding than the risk carrier approach.

Some firms are producing full capital distributions at time zero, for instance by evaluating the change in net assets in each of thousands of different scenarios. The full recalculation approach involves producing capital distributions at future points in time. This is challenging as proxies for liability movements are likely to be required, particularly where best-estimate liabilities are themselves the result of stochastic calculations, and time-zero replicating formulae or portfolios might not be robust over the full projection horizon. Other fitting methods such as least squares Monte Carlo provide interesting possibilities.

Pros and cons

This decision on the capital projection approach is an important one. The objective is to produce timely projections in which the business has sufficient confidence to be willing to use them when making decisions. If the projections do not meet these basic requirements then return on investment will disappoint. Three factors are important:

  • Whether the approach is robust technically.
  • Whether the approach can be industrialised into an efficient and controlled process.
  • Whether the approach gives business units ownership of their projections.

Not all users will require the same level of technical accuracy and granularity. Neither does a single methodology need to be applied to all product groups, provided that the results can be appropriately aggregated. For instance, it is possible to project 1-in-200 capital by risk for annuity business and combine these amounts with those derived from a risk carrier approach for other business.

Figure 2 shows that the 17 firms participating in the Capital Projections Survey 2011 are either using or intending to use different approaches for projecting Solvency II solvency capital requirement (SCR) and economic capital. Some are expecting to use more than one approach - hence the bars do not sum to 100%.

Firms are already using capital projections of varying sophistication to help answer key commercial questions. Solvency II raises the bar and is forcing firms to reassess the adequacy of their solutions.

The starting point should be a clear articulation of the uses to which projections will be put, and a prioritisation of these. An appraisal of alternative projection approaches will help to ensure that investment in development of projection capabilities is made wisely.

Projections will never be borne out perfectly, but they should bring valuable business benefits.

This article appeared in our August 2012 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

ta filler

Modelling the 1-in-200 Risks

Tail risks of life catastrophe arise from extreme events, such as pandemics or terrorist attacks. Because such events are rare, recent mortality experience data doesn't help with estimating the risk from future extreme events.
Monday 20th August 2012
Open-access content

The world of software: And then there was R

Alan Chalk uses R to visualise data in Google Earth
Friday 17th August 2012
Open-access content
2

Mindset for success

In the first of a series of articles, Jeremy Lazarus provides an overview of neuro-linguistic programming, and how it can help actuaries achieve better results, faster
Thursday 2nd August 2012
Open-access content
ta filler

Planet under pressure

As well as the Olympics, east London hosted another globally important event in 2012. This other event was much less reported in fact you might not have heard of it. A major scientific conference Planet Under Pressure was held in March with more than 3000 delegates
Monday 20th August 2012
Open-access content

Testing your model

Model development and upgrades cost time and money. Errors in insurance companies’ models can be costly, in terms of money and time, to remediate as well as result in harmful effects such as under or over reserving, financial losses, reporting errors or missed opportunities
Thursday 23rd August 2012
Open-access content
ta filler

The environment: What are actuaries doing?

Therese Kieve considers actuarial efforts in planetary preservation
Thursday 23rd August 2012
Open-access content

Latest from Life insurance

ytg

Seek cover

When it comes to sustaining your products’ performance in a ‘polycrisis’, customer engagement is key. Marco Spagnuolo outlines how life insurers can weather today’s economic storm
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
67

Knock-on effects: the risks of cyber crime for life insurers

Life and health insurers need to consider how cyber risk could potentially impact them, say Visesh Gosrani, Mikhail Norshteyn and Karl Oliver
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content
tsj

On the write track: using machine learning to predict underwriting decisions

Yafei (Patricia) Wang looks at the use of machine learning to predict underwriting decisions for life and health insurance
Wednesday 3rd August 2022
Open-access content

Latest from August 2012

ta filler

Omnibus II vote delay raises concerns over Solvency II timetable

A European Parliament vote on the legislation which underpins new rules governing Europe's insurance industry has been put back by a month, raising concerns over the timetable for implementing the system.
Friday 31st August 2012
Open-access content
ta

Ill health 'is stopping 500,000 people near retirement from working'

Nearly half a million people approaching retirement are being prevented from working by disability or poor health, the Trades Union Congress said today.
Friday 31st August 2012
Open-access content

Enhanced annuity sales break £1bn barrier for first time

Quarterly sales of enhanced annuities exceeded £1bn for the first time between April and June 2012, according to figures published by Towers Watson today.
Thursday 30th August 2012
Open-access content

Latest from formbuilder_item_removed

2

Implementing IFRS 17 Discount Curves: Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 requires liability cash flows to be discounted at rates that reflect the characteristics of the cash flows, including their liquidity
Tuesday 3rd September 2019
Open-access content
2

Profit Emergence Under IFRS 9 and IFRS 17: The impact of choice of liability discount rate

With the IFRS 17 accounting standard, insurers need to understand the patterns of profit emergence that arise under the standard, and how current business and methodology decisions affect such patterns.
Wednesday 10th July 2019
Open-access content
2

Whitepaper: Aggregation and diversification of the IFRS 17 Risk Adjustment

This paper forms part of a series of high-level papers designed to provide an introduction to different features of the risk adjustment that should be considered in advance of implementation.
Tuesday 29th January 2019
Open-access content

Latest from inline_image_missing_alt_text

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
2

Bitcoin: In the vaults

Blockchain technology and the trading of bitcoin were introduced in October 2008 in the famous paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from inline_image_undersized

2

Bitcoin: In the vaults

Blockchain technology and the trading of bitcoin were introduced in October 2008 in the famous paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
2

New frontiers of technology

Alizabeth Calder examines the challenges facing actuaries in an increasingly tech and data-based world
Thursday 3rd October 2019
Open-access content
2

The workforce of tomorrow

A group of employment professionals specialising in insurance and finance discuss emerging recruitment trends. Chris Seekings reports
Tuesday 6th August 2019
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Life Actuarial Contract - Capital Project (outside IR35)

England
Negotiable
Reference
149010

Pricing Consultant (Non-Life)

London / Leeds
Up to £70,000 + Benefits
Reference
148996

Senior Actuary

London (Central)
Negotiable
Reference
148991
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ