Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • March 2012
03

ERM: Counting the cost of enterprise risk management

Open-access content Tuesday 28th February 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Paul Klumpes asks what actuaries can learn from the accountant’s perspective on managing risk

2
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework has recently been endorsed as the basis for reporting and managing risks for most industrial firms. But there remains some ambiguity as to what constitutes an appropriate basis for analysing enterprise risk management (ERM) within insurance firms.

—

For instance, the UK actuarial profession is keen to endorse international standards on this issue. However, there is evidence that UK insurance firms focusing on accounting rates of return (such as return on equity or ROE) tend to use different approaches to managing risk for performance reporting than for management planning and control.

Since the COSO framework and ERM was originally embedded in financial reporting, one outstanding issue is whether performance measurement or long-term planning and control should be the primary basis for identifying and reporting ERM.

Given that, for accounting, the focus is mostly on performance measurement, whereas actuaries are concerned with long-term planning and control implications related to their accountability for implementing ERM strategy, it should not be surprising that an accountant would want to have a view on this issue.

The main areas that I will touch on concern some missing links in the relationship between accounting and actuarial professionals. In particular, I will look at the interaction between the operation of ERM and internal control and information systems. It is important to recall that the role of ERM and COSO as 'compliance-orientated' internal control frameworks originated from US legislation.

Other key terms within the definition of ERM concern risk appetite and risk tolerance. Sir David Walker's independent review of corporate governance in UK banks suggests that "board-level engagement in the high-level risk process should be materially increased, with particular attention to the monitoring of risk and discussion leading to decisions on the entity's risk appetite and tolerance... above all in monitoring risk and setting risk appetite and relevance parameters, which are at the heart of the strategy of the entity.''

Presumably, both these terms are key to actuarial implementation of ERM in general insurance contexts as defined by the COSO ERM framework. The framework is more commonly associated (outside the FSA) with the risk-assessment work that the FSA carries out in many financial firms. However, although the requirements are now being implemented, there is little transparency.

A similar issue arises for banks with their Basel II and IFRS capital adequacy requirements and reported accounting ratios. It is surprising that there are still no auditing requirements for the monitoring of Basel II or Solvency II, as they are outside the financial statements. Recently, the FSA proposed that this issue be addressed.

It seems also surprising that, given the whole debate about Solvency II, there is little discussion of the relationship between actuarial risk management and accounting (either on-balance sheet or off-balance sheet) risk management. For example, in Australia, from 1 January 2013, a new standard will compel public accounting firms to establish, maintain, monitor and document a risk management framework. There is no such requirement for actuarial consulting firms, either in the UK or other countries.

Table 1 shows how subtle differences in reporting regime affect the nature, scope and scale of risk reporting. It illustrates the key variations in both the objective, basis, and verifiability and focus of alternative accounting, actuarial management and regulatory purposes. For, while the main objective of financial reporting is to provide information to capital providers, meaning that performance management is the key, the regulator is more concerned about capital adequacy and ensuring that there is a minimum level of solvency. The internal view presumably takes a combination of the two, but is primarily directed at long-term planning and control.

Table 1: Alternative bases for risk reporting Caption
  Shareholder reporting
Regulatory reporting
 Own business reporting
Key reference
 IFRS IAS 32,
IFRS 7, 9
 FSA, US SEC, Solvency II CEIOPS  Professional guidelines and actuary practice
 Scope  Annual report  Reporting filing FSA, Basel Pillar III  Actuarial risk classification
 Main focus  Market risk  Solvency risk  Strategy risk
 Verifiability  Auditor  Regulator  None
 Assumed valuation basis  Historic cost - fair value  Risk weighted (prudent)?  Cash flow
 Risk basis  Earnings at risk  Value at risk  Cash flow at risk
 Primary objective  Performance measurement  Capital adequacy  Sustainability of long-term business model
 Main users  Shareholders  Policyholders  Management





The lack of coordination between accounting and regulatory-based reporting is evidenced in reporting practices by banks. These give investors little guidance about the interrelation between regulatory-based capital and accounting-based capital ratios.

One has to review the accounts of Swiss banks to work out that often the 'risk weighted assets' used to evaluate capital do not even have any corresponding item on the balance sheet, such as 'operational risk' or 'market risk'. It turns out that the risk-weighted assets (which are based on true values rather than fair values) vastly overstate the accounting-based assets and therefore result in reported capital that exceeds that based on unweighted accounting statements.

This is particularly the case for banks that have relatively risky portfolios. Much of the recent evolution from Basel II to Basel III concerns dealing with attempts by banks to shift these risks by reclassifying liabilities and equities, and treating 'loss-absorbing capital' as a buffer.

A major criticism of bank reporting is the failure to decompose capital ratios between banking and trading books, since the latter is subject to fair value reporting. If the situation for banks is complicated, presumably similar issues apply to insurance firms and pension funds, regarding the quality of their liabilities and capital.

In particular, there are different stakeholders (shareholders versus policyholders, and employee versus employer participants). Whereas the accounting perspective tends to take the position of the shareholder and employer, the actuarial (regulatory) perspective tends to take the position of the policyholder and the employee. What is the position for insurance firms that similarly have to evaluate the quality of their liabilities under Solvency II?

There is still ambiguity as to how the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) will implement a particular basis for risk reporting. Similarly, there are still many unresolved issues that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is grappling with in terms of resolving apparent dilemmas in income and revenue recognition. Perhaps greater clarification on the key elements and objectives, and the different stakeholders affected, would help.

The controversies surrounding accounting manipulation and creative accounting (for example, AIG, Enron) has focused on the scope for banking and insurance entities to place undesirable exposures off balance sheet. Much of this concerns the role of functional versus institutional or legal interpretation of accounts.

An important development in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has been the move away from literalist towards functional views of hedge accounting (Financial Times, 10 December 2010). However, there is little evidence that such positions are also evolving for insurance contracts. It is surprising, therefore, that the insurance industry and the actuarial profession has not made more effort to enhance transparency in these areas.

While efforts to classify risks are to be applauded, the interrelationship between strategy risk, ERM practices and capital management and reporting remain obscure. The ARROW audits of the FSA on many firms require those risks to be clarified, yet there is little disclosure on these issues in annual reports. Should not the failure or inadequacy of risk management practices be disclosed to enhance transparency in reporting?

More research is needed to clarify regulatory solvency versus IFRS-based capital statements, so that the investor and user can better appreciate the link between risk management practices, capital management and performance in the sector.

After all, COSO and ERM frameworks were intended to enhance corporate governance. Increasing the scope and depth of cooperation between accountants and actuaries will be the key to successful implementation.
Paul Klumpes professor of accounting EDHEC Business School
This article appeared in our March 2012 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Pensions: ETVs and ethics

Jim Boyle reflects on the enhanced transfer values debate from the Actuarial Profession's seminar series ‘Current issues in pensions’
Tuesday 28th February 2012
Open-access content
2

Pensions: What has governance got to do with actuaries?

Pensions actuaries would do well to look beyond their own industry sector to discover more about the principles of good governance, writes Hamish Wilson
Monday 27th February 2012
Open-access content
2

Caribbean consulting - diary of a travelling pensions actuary

Nick Silver shares his entertaining experiences of an enviable and extraordinary pensions consulting assignment in the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) member states
Tuesday 28th February 2012
Open-access content
2

Europe-wide coalition rallies against 'Solvency II for pensions'

A Europe-wide coalition of employers, workers and pensions industry groups has called on the European Commission not to apply Solvency II rules to occupational pensions.
Friday 2nd March 2012
Open-access content
2

Solvency II: The real actuarial function

Colin Czapiewski considers the general insurance actuarial function within the framework of Solvency II
Tuesday 28th February 2012
Open-access content
2

Sutcliffe given key role as FRC reforms move forward

Jim Sutcliffe, chairman of the Financial Reporting Council’s Board for Actuarial Standards, has been given a new role as part of a far-reaching package of reforms at the independent regulatory body.
Tuesday 27th March 2012
Open-access content

Latest from Global

rdth

Make My Money Matter's Tony Burdon on the practical power of sustainable pensions

Years working in international development showed Tony Burdon, head of Make My Money Matter, that sustainable pensions can harness trillions of pounds to build a better world – at a scale governments and charities can’t. He talks to Travis Elsum
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
ULH

Growth of the profession in Zambia

One of only three Fellows in Zambia, Mulenga C Mutati anticipates exciting growth in the country’s actuarial sector
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
cj

Natural capital investing

Chris Howells and Andrew Dreaneen discuss how today’s investments in natural capital profit portfolios as well as the planet and humanity
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content

Latest from Position

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
2

Expert advice

This edition of the magazine focuses on data science and its applications, which will be a recurring theme for the IFoA.
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content
2

Tesla sparks fears of insurance market overhaul

That is according to a new report from Moody's, which highlights how Tesla has already started offering premiums that are up to 30% cheaper than those of mainstream insurers.
Friday 14th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from March 2012

Spreadsheet ISTOCK

UK pension funds post average 4.3% returns in 2011

UK pension funds recorded average returns of 4.3% last year the third consecutive year they have posted a positive return, according to figures published by BNY Mellon yesterday.
Friday 30th March 2012
Open-access content

'Urgent need' for insurance accounting standard

KPMG has urged the International Accounting Standards Board to finalise a new standard for insurance accounting as soon as possible.
Friday 30th March 2012
Open-access content

Airline insurance prices 'likely to remain stable'

Despite historically low levels of airline insurance claims last year, continuing high risk in the industry means prices are likely to remain stable for most airline insurance programmes, according to Aon Risk Solutions.
Friday 30th March 2012
Open-access content

Latest from formbuilder_item_removed

2

Implementing IFRS 17 Discount Curves: Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 requires liability cash flows to be discounted at rates that reflect the characteristics of the cash flows, including their liquidity
Tuesday 3rd September 2019
Open-access content
2

Profit Emergence Under IFRS 9 and IFRS 17: The impact of choice of liability discount rate

With the IFRS 17 accounting standard, insurers need to understand the patterns of profit emergence that arise under the standard, and how current business and methodology decisions affect such patterns.
Wednesday 10th July 2019
Open-access content
2

Whitepaper: Aggregation and diversification of the IFRS 17 Risk Adjustment

This paper forms part of a series of high-level papers designed to provide an introduction to different features of the risk adjustment that should be considered in advance of implementation.
Tuesday 29th January 2019
Open-access content

Latest from inline_image_missing_alt_text

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
2

Bitcoin: In the vaults

Blockchain technology and the trading of bitcoin were introduced in October 2008 in the famous paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from inline_image_undersized

2

Bitcoin: In the vaults

Blockchain technology and the trading of bitcoin were introduced in October 2008 in the famous paper by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
2

New frontiers of technology

Alizabeth Calder examines the challenges facing actuaries in an increasingly tech and data-based world
Thursday 3rd October 2019
Open-access content
2

The workforce of tomorrow

A group of employment professionals specialising in insurance and finance discuss emerging recruitment trends. Chris Seekings reports
Tuesday 6th August 2019
Open-access content

Latest from small_opening_image

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 03

2

Insurance: Reserving - Bridging the gap on long-tail liabilities

David Odell puts forward a method to span the rift between uncertainty and best estimates
Tuesday 28th February 2012
Open-access content
2

Q&A: On my agenda: Charles Cowling

Yvonne Wan talks to Charles Cowling of JLT Pension Capital Strategies about his work with the actuarial profession and his charitable activities
Tuesday 28th February 2012
Open-access content
2

Actuary of the future: Adam Roebuck

Light-bulb moments, rock operas and lego combine to make Towers Watson's Adam Roebuck an actuary of the future
Monday 27th February 2012
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Exposure Management Analyst

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
148639

Pricing - Casualty Actuary

London (Central)
£128K + bonus + benefits
Reference
148638

Reporting Contractor

Negotiable
Reference
148636
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ