Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2023
General Features

X and why

Open-access content Dr Eugenia Cheng — Thursday 4th May 2023
tyd

What is it that intrigues us about maths? As her latest book is published, category theorist Eugenia Cheng says it’s the smallest yet biggest question of all: why?

I have always loved maths. I want to know why things are happening, and have never stopped being a toddler who keeps asking questions. Maths always gave me satisfying answers to those ‘whys’ – and generated the most interesting new questions.

My mother always talked to me about maths and logical thinking at home – things such as patterns, graphs and logical concepts like converses, false equivalences and the importance of clear definitions. She worked in the City, commuting by train wearing a suit, carrying a briefcase and surrounded by men. I think this helped me not to feel pressured by gender stereotypes. It also helped that I went to a girls’ school and had no brothers, so there were no comparisons with boys. It never occurred to me that girls might not be good at maths. I arrived at school ahead in maths, putting me at an advantage.

It was obvious that I wanted to study the subject at university. There was a moment when I considered doing music, but I was brought up to be financially pragmatic and it seemed more plausible to make a living with maths and play music on the side, rather than the other way around.

When I was young I wanted to be ‘a mathematician’ without knowing what that meant. In any case, this did not count as a career from my school’s perspective. During Sixth Form, when we were applying for university, we had to research three careers we were interested in that could follow from our degree subject. ‘Actuary’ was suggested to me as one of them; I also researched accounting and merchant banking.

I never ended up being clear what a merchant banker does, but actuarial work captured my imagination. However, I didn’t enjoy probability and statistics at school because the data we analysed was fabricated. We never got to analyse real data, let alone set up a study, obtain data and analyse it. The idea of doing this for real situations made me think about statistics differently. However, the lure of the ‘why?’ questions won out so I went into pure maths, and then into arguably its most abstract branch: category theory.

Leading questions

It makes me sad that so many people leave school hating maths, feeling traumatised by it or just being glad that they never have to do it again. Most are put off for the wrong reasons, having only been shown a narrow, rigid and unrepresentative view of the subject. Maths is frequently presented as ‘important’ and ‘useful’, but lessons so often fail to teach important or useful things, or emphasise exactly what the importance of maths is. Often it isn’t the content that’s important (I never use trigonometry in my daily life!) but the way of thinking. However, in the race to cover the curriculum and get students through exams, there is little time for thinking – in particular, for deep and open-ended questions.

I wrote Is Maths Real? to address that. Curious students have deep questions about why things are true in maths, but those questions aren’t often encouraged. I wanted to validate and answer them – and not just in a sentence, because these are questions that spark long journeys of mathematical discovery. I start with simple questions such as ‘Why does 1+1=2?’ and show how this takes us deep into serious mathematical thinking. Not only are these questions profound, but they also show us the true point of maths, which is developing ways of thinking clearly and logically to build rigorous arguments and push forward human understanding while keeping it on secure foundations.

This is part of the broad aim of all my work: reaching people who have been, or are in danger of being, excluded from maths and mainstream education, and giving them a way in. I want to eliminate the concept of ‘maths people’ and ‘non-maths people’. I firmly believe maths can be for everyone, that it can help everyone, and that we need to find ways to make that a reality.

Dr Eugenia Cheng is scientist in residence at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and an honorary visiting fellow of pure mathematics at City, University of London. Her book "Is Maths Real?" (Profile Books) is out on 1 June

Image credit | Shutterstock

actuary cover may 2023.jpg
This article appeared in our May 2023 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

tf

What planet are we on?

We are kidding ourselves about the favoured climate-risk scenarios, says Mark Cliffe. A more realistic alternative incorporates the inconvenient truths they ignore: real life and human nature
Thursday 4th May 2023
Open-access content
uyf

Routemaster

Derek Steeden and Andrew Reid discuss how capital-backed funding arrangements can help defined benefit pension schemes map out a satisfying final destination
Thursday 4th May 2023
Open-access content
rts

When the music stops

Assessing the three largest finance crises in recent history, Ree Chen, David Chen and Susan Siew look at their common themes, and lessons to be drawn
Thursday 4th May 2023
Open-access content
ug

Apt apps

While the digital world is often blamed for poor mental health, some areas aim to improve it. Members of the IFoA Mental Health Working Party explain how digital mental health tools help to support insurers and their customers
Thursday 4th May 2023
Open-access content
ty

Trust exercise

Chris O’Brien takes us though the legal constraints affecting the way in which pension trustees deal with commutations. And should commutation factors be reviewed more frequently?
Thursday 4th May 2023
Open-access content
uh

Man vs machine

ChatGPT was asked to come up with a taxonomy for AI ethics risk management. Karen Usher explains the results, which you may find surprising and reassuring. For now...
Thursday 4th May 2023
Open-access content
Also filed in
General Features
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Reserving Analyst

London (City of)
Negotiable
Reference
149485

Senior GI Modeler - Capital and Planning

London (Central)
£ excellent
Reference
149436

Risk Oversight Manager

Flexible / hybrid with a minimum of 2 days per week office-based
£ excellent
Reference
149435
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ