Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January/February 2023
General Features

When 'human' isn't female

Open-access content Wednesday 1st February 2023 — updated 9.48am, Thursday 16th February 2023
Authors
Adél Drew
il

It was only last year that the first anatomically correct female crash test dummy was created. With so much data still based on the male perspective, are we truly meeting all consumer needs? Adél Drew discusses her thoughts, based on the book Invisible Women by Caroline Criado Perez  

In her 1949 book The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir wrote: “Representation of the world, like the world itself, is the work of men; they describe it from their own point of view, which they confuse with the absolute truth.” (Epigraph to Invisible Women by Caroline Criado Perez). That same year, the first crash test dummy was created – and I doubt de Beauvoir realised how precisely this invention would illustrate her point.

Crash test dummies test the impact of vehicle accidents on human bodies. While more men than women are injured in vehicle accidents, they are more frequently involved in them in the first place. Women are 17% more likely than men to die in the event of a car crash, based on university studies in the US, and 73% more likely to sustain serious injuries in a front-end collision (Invisible Women, p186). In the world of crash test dummies, ‘human body’ has really meant ‘male body’; the first anatomically correct female crash test dummy was only created in 2022.

This is just one example of many where the word ‘human’ has effectively been a synonym for ‘male’, and not the only one with deadly consequences. When we consider mid-20th century society, it is not surprising that crash test dummies were modelled on male anatomy. Problems arise when conditions change and the assumptions of a previous era are not explicit, remaining hidden in plain sight. This can result in societal systems that hide biases.

The harm caused by these blind spots is not intentional: it comes from the knowledge of those with the most influence, who think their experience is representative of everyone else’s. One reason male crash test dummies are not representative of female vehicle occupants in an accident is that seatbelts do not sit in the correct position on female bodies, because of their breasts. This has resulted in a system of safety testing, and by extension car design, that favours male safety over female safety. This, combined with the higher number of car accidents involving men, has created a data gap that masks the reality of vehicle safety for females.

As a side note, I write this article from my perspective as a woman and have therefore focused on the female experience. However, the concepts apply equally to other under-represented groups, and I encourage the reader to consider parallels.

Gaps in leadership

The invisible nature of mistaken experience shows the importance of ensuring your leaders represent the staff and customers for whom you are making decisions. Without the empowered voices of those with diverse experiences, we risk remaining blind. However, even when it comes to appointing diverse leaders, there may be systemic biases.

Consider the objective selection criteria for inclusion on UK bank notes: the person must have made an important contribution to our society and culture through their innovation, leadership or values, and there must be a suitable and easily recognisable portrait of them (Invisible Women, p15-16). The historical denial of female contributions to science is so pervasive that it has a term: the Matilda Effect (after US suffragist Matilda Joslyn Gage). Add in historical female gender roles, the prevalence of network-based recruiting, the ‘people’ who have decided what constitutes ‘important’, and the lower wages and shorter career spans historically experienced by females, and we can see that this ‘objective’ criteria is not objective at all.

A US study by psychologists Lin Bian and Andrei Cimpian with philosopher Sarah-Jane Leslie, Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests, shows that, from as young as the age of six, girls stop associating brilliance with females (Invisible Women, p101). Much of this is due to historical representation in what we are taught; the same factor contributes to impostor syndrome. Yet many businesses attempt to tackle this issue through leadership courses that aim to help women fit into the existing system, with little focus on the idea that it is the system that fosters this feeling in the first place. This is like expecting women to change their anatomy to better fit the cars we have already designed.

Gaps in actuarial work

When we think about diversity, much of the focus is on diversity within our organisations – but what about the insurance products we design? Under new Consumer Duty regulations, Principle 12 requires firms to act to deliver “good outcomes” for retail customers. The Prudential Regulation Authority has issued guidance stating that the product or service design must meet the needs, characteristics and objectives of customers in the target market to deliver good outcomes. Given who the voices at the table were when most insurance products were first designed, and whom they were designed for, leaders should think about whether they truly meet the needs and objectives of all the ‘humans’ in our target markets.

Here is a simplified example. Consider a heterosexual couple who are about to have a child and have some level of individual insurance protection. Let’s also assume that this household does not receive any group protection benefits from work, so their cover does not extend automatically during parental leave. Traditionally, we would assume that the male is the main breadwinner, with the protection policy aiming to protect the family from the loss of his income.

Current product designs allow for a waiver-of-premium option during times when the policyholder cannot work due to illness or injury. There is no widely available equivalent rider designed to accommodate a breadwinner who takes time off work on the arrival of a baby. While the mother is legally entitled to 90% of her earnings for the first six weeks, and the minimum of £156.66 per week or 90% of earnings for the next 33 weeks, the father in this example has no such entitlement. This presents two potential issues:

  1. If the mother is the breadwinner, she faces a difficult choice: go back to work after six weeks, or risk the household not being able to cover their bills. This might be manageable for a life-insurance policy but what about a more expensive critical illness policy? If she did decide to take more time off, her options may be to lapse the policy and lose the benefit at a time when protection is needed the most, or put household finances under strain.

  2. If the father is the breadwinner and it makes sense for the mother to take the full year of maternity leave offered, a similar issue may arise if he chooses to spend time with his new child. A system where it is seen as a female’s job to look after children is thus perpetuated, which often results in lifelong financial repercussions for women – including poverty in retirement.

There are greater societal issues here, but perhaps offering a waiver of premium benefit during parental leave could create a fairer outcome for both mother and father.

Gaps to close

There are widespread systemic data gaps around women’s experiences and we will make inadequate decisions for half the population if we don’t explicitly acknowledge them. In some cases, established systems unintentionally continue the cycle of discrimination that we are attempting to address through other means; in others, they can be harmful, or even deadly, for women.

While there has been progress on reducing the gender pay gap, we must look at the hidden perspective gaps in our systems – otherwise we are at risk of overlooking biases, perpetuating past injustices and placing unnecessary hurdles on the road to true equity.

Adél Drew is a senior consultant at Milliman in the London office, specialising in actuarial risk management

Image credit | iStock

Linked ACT JanFeb23_Full LR.jpg
This article appeared in our January/February 2023 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

bl

'Takaful' models of Islamic insurance

Ethical, varied and a growing market – ‘takaful’ Islamic insurance is worth knowing about, wherever you’re from and whatever your beliefs, says Ali Asghar Bhuriwala
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
td

Brain power

The latest microchips mimic cerebral function. Smaller, faster and more efficient than their predecessors, they have the potential to save lives and help insurers, argues Amarnath Suggu
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
yug

World view: Cambodia

Jaishree Kularajah shares what it’s like to work in this south-east Asian nation’s burgeoning life insurance industry
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
lugy

New series on soft skills: emotional intelligence

Starting our new series on soft skills in the workplace, Amy Jacobson argues that, for actuaries, emotional intelligence is as important as grey matter
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
dty

Can we embrace a circular economy?

With our pull on the planet’s resources, are we bold enough to embrace a circular economy? The potential benefits are not just material, argues Travis Elsum
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
fiy

Project New Horizon: final thoughts

In the last part of our series on the IFoA’s programme addressing the future of the profession, Tan Suee Chieh, Nico Aspinall and Lucy Saye lay out its conclusions – and the part you can play
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content

Latest from General Insurance

uh

The road to understanding

Vrishti Goel examines how data analytics could provide more personalised insurance products, for example within the motor insurance industry
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content
h

Agility trial: How can ‘agile methodology’ benefit insurance?

Stefania Varnava and Yiannis Parizas examine the benefits of using agile methodology within the insurance industry
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content
D

The next generation of pricing

Massimo Cavadini, Davide Burlon and Gili Smadja discuss how automated machine learning is changing the role of the pricing actuary
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content

Latest from General Features

yguk

Is anybody out there?

There’s no point speaking if no one hears you. Effective communication starts with silence – this is the understated art of listening, says Tan Suee Chieh
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
ers

By halves

Reducing the pensions gap between men and women is a work in progress – and there’s still a long way to go, with women retiring on 50% less than men, says Alexandra Miles
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
web_Question-mark-lightbulbs_credit_iStock-1348235111.png

Figuring it out

Psychologist Wendy Johnson recalls how qualifying as an actuary and running her own consultancy in the US allowed her to overcome shyness and gave her essential skills for life
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content

Latest from Data Science

gc

Free for all

Coding: those who love it can benefit those who don’t by creating open-source tools. Yiannis Parizas outlines two popular data science programming languages, and the simulator he devised and shared
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
res

Interview: Tim Harford on the importance of questioning our assumptions

Tim Harford speaks to Ruolin Wang about why it’s so important to slow down and question things from emotive headlines to the numbers and algorithms we use in our work
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content
uh

The road to understanding

Vrishti Goel examines how data analytics could provide more personalised insurance products, for example within the motor insurance industry
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content

Latest from Adél Drew

ihi

Revolution: adopting operational resilience for risk management systems

In a complex world, our current risk management systems may not be up to the job of navigating disruption. Adél Drew looks at how adopting ‘operational resilience’ can help
Wednesday 3rd August 2022
Open-access content

Latest from January/February 2023

jtd

DEI strategy: a year on

Stephen Mann, CEO of the IFoA, explains what work is being done to make sure everyone in the profession feels that they count
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
KV

Liability-driven investments: new landscape

What now for liability-driven investments, after last year’s crash in the market? Pensions experts Rakesh Girdharlal and Moiz Khan say it should lead to a more balanced approach
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
ykv

DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL PANEL: Ian William Conlon FIA

On 5-6 October 2021 and 4 October 2022, the Disciplinary Tribunal Panel considered a charge of misconduct against Mr Ian William Conlon (the respondent).
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Manager - Building new team!

London (Central)
Up to £130k + Bonus
Reference
148845

Shape the Future of Credit Risk Model Development

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ six figure salary with excellent bonus potential + package
Reference
148843

Longevity Director

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ six figure salary with excellent bonus potential + package
Reference
148842
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ