Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2022
IFoA News
News

Adjudication panel meeting: Mr Alastair JR Lauder FIA

Open-access content Wednesday 1st June 2022

On 4 February 2022 the Adjudication Panel considered an allegation of misconduct against Mr Lauder FIA (the respondent). The allegation relates to his role as an actuary employed by Company 1.

The panel found evidence to support the allegation that the respondent co-wrote a Solvency II capital report for Syndicates A and B that was not compliant with the Reliability Objective within Technical Actuarial Standard 100 (TAS 100), in that: adjustments made outside of the core capital model for Syndicate A were not communicated to users of the capital report; and the reason for the adjustments to Syndicate A not being applied to Syndicate B was not communicated to users of the capital report.

The panel also found associated breaches of paragraphs 1, 3.2, 3.3 and 5 of TAS 100.

The panel upheld that the respondent’s actions were a breach of the Communication principle and the Competence and Care principle in the Actuaries’ Code (versions 3.0) and determined that these allegations disclosed a prima facie case of misconduct.

In considering sanction, the panel considered all relevant information and was satisfied that the appropriate and proportionate sanction in this case was a reprimand and a period of education, training or supervised practice.

Read a full copy of the published determination at bit.ly/IFoA_IDP_Determinations

Linked ACT Jun22_Full LR.jpg
This article appeared in our June 2022 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Also filed in:
IFoA News
News

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ