Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2021
General Features

Full tilt: ESG’s place in strategic asset allocation

Open-access content Wednesday 3rd November 2021
Authors
Ziling Jiang

Ziling Jiang and Cyril Bosse-Platiere explain how institutional investors can develop strategic asset allocations using asset classes adjusted to provide higher ESG ratings

web_p16-17_Full-tilt_CREDIT_GettyImages-1157561113.jpg

The environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings of investments, such as their levels of climate risk exposure and carbon emissions, have become important for global institutional investors. However, incorporating an ESG preference into the strategic asset allocation (SAA) – ‘ESG tilting’ – requires thought.

SAA involves setting target allocations at asset class level and rebalancing the portfolio periodically. Each asset class is assigned an assumed mean return and variance, and an efficient frontier is then constructed to determine the optimal investment strategy for any specified level of portfolio risk, such that the highest expected return is achieved for that level of risk.

We cannot simply perceive one asset class to be more ESG-friendly than another, for example investment grade versus high yield corporate bonds. On the other hand, we know that ESG tilting will reshape the profile of our asset classes in two respects:

  • At industry sector level, the weights of the most carbon-intensive sectors will likely be slashed in an ESG-tilted asset class. As risk/returns differ significantly between industry sectors, such sector re-weighting will lead to a risk/return change for each of those asset classes, and a different SAA outcome.

  • At security level, there will be trade-offs between the most ESG-friendly securities and the most risk/return-efficient ones. Such trade-offs become more obvious when the two cohorts deviate to a substantial extent, and become complicated when we are faced with the task of selecting a limited number of securities and determining their weights from a vast index.

ESG-tilted assumption setting is rather complicated in practice. For example, our credit analysts may advise that there are only several hundred corporate bonds within our ‘investible universe’, and our end portfolio may contain less than 100 bonds due to the portfolio size limit. If we want the key attributes (duration, quality, solvency capital requirement, sector weights except for the carbon-intensive ones) of our end portfolio to remain close to the index, and we want some ESG tilting, there will be intricate optimisation mechanisms. How do we perform a fine calibration?

ESG tilting in practice

We will use a worked example to show how ESG tilting at SAA level can be implemented using a linear optimiser. Our example is based on investment-grade corporate bonds – usually the weightiest asset class for an insurer, and one for which there is often an abundance of ESG information available.

The first step is to identify the investible universe, which for simplicity we will assume is the whole of the ICE BofA US Corporate Index (C0A0), containing about 9,100 bonds. The key attributes broken down by industry sector-level are shown in Table 1.

The index volatility of 4.9% is calculated by mixing sector-level volatilities using a correlation matrix, all calibrated using historical total return data.

You will notice there are a few very carbon-intensive industry sectors (highlighted in green), but otherwise the ESG and climate change theme scores are similar. If we halve the weights of these carbon-intensive sectors and pro-rata the excess weights to the remainder, the characteristics of the index are shown in Table 1’s row B).

To better reflect the multi-step filtering process in portfolio construction, we use a linear optimiser to build a model portfolio (MP) with the objective of maximising the running yield, and the following constraints:

  • Duration, rating and issuer concentration are to be broadly the same as the original index

  • Retain 60% of the securities in the index

  • Industry sector weights are to be within ±5% of the index’s sector weights, except for the carbon-intensive sectors that we adjusted

  • ESG and climate change theme scores are to each be enhanced by at least 10%

  • Carbon intensity is to be reduced by at least 30%.

The outcome portfolio – row C) – has the attributes shown in Table 1.

Table 1

As an optional final step, suppose that, unlike the simplified assumption we made for the sector-weight adjustments, our credit analysts instructed us that the investible universe was only a small fraction of the index – several hundred bonds. Our end portfolio (MP’) then needs to be measured against this much reduced starting point.

A ‘yield-optimised, but not ESG-optimised’ similar model portfolio is built in the same way, except that only the non-ESG guidelines constraints are used:

  • Duration, rating and issuer concentration to be broadly the same as the original index

  • Retain 60% of the securities in the index

  • Industry sector weights to be within ±5% of the index’s sector weights.

The expected return assumption of our ESG-tilted investment grade corporate bond asset class is calculated as:

                                   RESG-tilted index = Roriginal index + (RMP – RMP’)

By repeating these steps for all asset classes, we have the risk/return assumptions we need for an ESG-tilted SAA. If we only focus on credit asset classes (where ESG information is more easily available), that usually still covers more than 50% of a typical insurance balance sheet.

We believe that our ESG-tilted approach to strategic asset allocation offers a practical solution to establishing an efficient frontier with improved ESG ratings.


Notes for table 1:

* Yield-to-worst: the lowest possible yield that an investor could receive on a bond that does not default.

** Carbon intensity is the volume of carbon emissions (tons of CO2) per million dollars invested for the scheme’s assets.

*** Climate change theme score (on a scale of 0-10) is the weighted average of all climate risk-related attributes of the issuer, including carbon emissions, energy efficiency, product carbon footprint, insuring climate change risk and financing environmental impact.


Ziling Jiang is head of insurance analytics, EMEA at Neuberger Berman

Cyril Bosse-Platiere is an insurance strategist at Neuberger Berman

Image Credit | Getty

Linked ACT Nov21_Full LR.jpg
This article appeared in our November 2021 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Also filed in:
General Features
Topics:
Investment
Environment
General Insurance

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ