Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • August 2021
General Features

Up to scratch: how regions and sectors are responding to climate change

Open-access content Thursday 5th August 2021
Authors
Iancu Daramus

Iancu Daramus looks at how effectively companies in different regions and sectors are responding to climate change

web_p40-41_Up-to-scratch_Circular-sustainable-chart_CREDIT_Getty-1284279767.jpg

As public concern over climate change grows, so too does the expectation that investment professionals will address it. Regulators are also increasing their focus on climate risks: for example, climate stress tests are making their way into the supervision of banks and insurers, and UK pension funds are required to report on their management of climate risks and opportunities. 

A key challenge is that the data required to accurately quantify climate risk is not fully available – and, in some cases, it is not very meaningful without forward-looking analysis. For example, two oil companies might have the same emissions today, but if one is linking executives’ pay to reducing emissions and the other is incentivising oil and gas production, their risk profiles may diverge. Past emissions performance is not a guarantee of future emissions.

To bridge this gap, additional research is required. As an example, Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) has developed a framework for analysing companies’ climate strategies and has published data on key climate performance indicators for around 1,000 companies covered by its Climate Impact Pledge engagement programme. The latest progress report on these companies (bit.ly/LGIM_CIP2021) reveals some positive indications on climate action, albeit with substantial disparity between and within regions and sectors.

Climate momentum is growing

While climate change is a global threat, the emphasis that companies place on addressing it varies significantly by region. Spurred by public and investor concerns, companies in the West have historically led the way, but a different story is now emerging. European companies continue to top climate ratings, but Asian companies have overtaken North America, with the largest relative increase since 2020 coming from emerging markets. Figure 1 shows the scores by region, and how these have changed since last year.

 

web_p41_Up-to-scratch_Figure-1.jpg

 

All sectors are exposed to climate risks and opportunities to some extent. Reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions will require far-reaching changes, beyond simply the phase-out of fossil fuels.

There are indications of momentum on climate action across sectors. The number of companies setting net-zero targets, for example, has almost doubled since October 2020. Apparel and cement companies top climate rankings on this measure, with a fifth of these sectors covered by net-zero targets – a remarkable increase from just 7% and 3%, respectively, last year.

 

“The gap between leaders and laggards is often higher within a given sector than between sectors”

 

It may seem counterintuitive that a high-emission sector such as cement could top rankings on net-zero targets, but these sectors are subject to persistent scrutiny, meaning more attention is devoted to putting in place environmental policies and emissions-reduction programmes.

For example, more than two-thirds of the shipping, utilities and oil and gas companies analysed have an emissions-reduction programme in place, compared to around a third of food, technology and telecommunications companies.

Significant variation remains

The existence of an emissions-reduction programme may not necessarily indicate its importance for a company’s management and leadership. Indeed, analysis indicates that, in the shipping sector, there is a disconnect between disclosed emissions reductions targets and the accountability of the board members responsible for meeting them, which lacks details.

The gap between leaders and laggards is often higher within a given sector than between sectors. Figure 2 shows climate change metrics across and within sectors, and highlights the extent of variation. For example, while the technology sector has the second highest average climate rating, the percentage of companies within this sector that meet set minimum standards is one of the lowest.

 

web_p42_Up-to-scratch_Figure-2.jpg

 

Pressure from investors, particularly through proxy voting, can help improve climate accountability across and within sectors. For example, in 2020, LGIM announced that it will be voting against all companies globally not meeting a sufficient proportion of its minimum standards. Figure 3 shows the split of companies with voting sanctions by sector.

 

 web_p42_Up-to-scratch_Figure-3.jpg

 

Financial and technology companies dominate the voting sanctions list, which may seem surprising at first glance, but reinforces the need for scrutiny outside the ‘usual suspects’ in the fossil fuel industry. For example, while oil and gas companies are beginning to take steps to reduce their emissions, financial institutions in general have been less forthcoming in setting targets for the emissions associated with their portfolios.

Looking at a subset of the financial industry – real estate investment trusts (REITs) – less than 10% of the sector fully meets minimum standards requiring the full lifecycle emissions analysis and disclosure covering the carbon embodied in construction materials, as well as the emissions associated with the use of buildings. With new regulations in the UK calling for all new homes to be ‘zero-carbon-ready’ by 2025, unsatisfactory disclosure in this area may be a proxy for companies being exposed to future regulatory risk. 

Momentum on climate action is growing across regions and sections. However, significant variation remains and substantial progress is required. Investors have an important role to play in influencing companies to improve on their climate policies and commitments; they can assert their influence through proxy voting, engagement – and if that fails – divestment.

As always, however, markets work best when supported and shaped by the right policies. The world’s eyes will soon be on COP26 in Glasgow, where policymakers are expected to strengthen ambitions to deliver on the Paris Agreement. As finance professionals, we must also rise to this challenge.

 

Iancu Daramus is a senior sustainability analyst at Legal & General Investment Management

Image Credit | Getty

The Actuary Aug 2021p1.png
This article appeared in our August 2021 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Also filed in:
General Features

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ