Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • News

Campaigners accuse US insurance giants of driving environmental and social crises

Open-access content Wednesday 26th May 2021

A scorecard of the insurance industry’s impact on people and the planet gives poor grades to several US insurers for exacerbating environmental and social crises.

Campaigners accuse US insurance giants of driving environmental and social crises

Research by UK-based campaigners ShareAction, which promotes responsible investment, claims US insurers are underwriting and investing in industries that fuel global warming, destroy biodiversity and violate human rights.

Its assessment of 70 leading insurers in 15 countries reveals that US insurers including AIG and Nationwide are “swimming against the global tide of sustainability and equity on issues such as fossil fuel extraction and forced labour”. 

ShareAction’s rankings give the lowest grade - an E - to 80 per cent of US insurers, compared to 52 per cent in Asia and 22 per cent in Europe. Five US companies - Nationwide, AIG, Allstate, Genworth Financial and Protective Life Insurance Company - appeared in the bottom 10 of the ranking, scoring less than 4 per cent each across the four categories of governance, climate change, biodiversity and human rights. While no insurer received an AA or AAA rating, three European companies — Axa, Allianz and Aviva — received an A grade. 

The ranking comes the insurance sector is facing pressure to wield their underwriting and investment clout to support sustainable and equitable development. Although insurers make up 12 of the 26 members of the United Nations-convened Net-Zero Asset Owners Alliance alongside plans for a Net-Zero Insurance Alliance, these efforts have not yet translated to positive environmental and social impact, ShareAction said. 

By contrast, 54 per cent of non-US insurers restrict underwriting for coal power although none of the companies surveyed has restricted underwriting for conventional oil and gas, despite the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warning that building new fossil fuel projects is incompatible with keeping global warming below 1.5°C. 

Eight out of ten US insurers have no board level expertise, accountability, key performance indicators or incentives related to responsible investment and underwriting. The exceptions were Liberty Mutual, Principal, Prudential Financial and MetLife. 

None of the US insurers with a property and casualty business have carried out scenario analysis to identify climate risks to their underwriting activity, compared with 46 per cent of non-US peers. ShareAction said the failure to assess the impact of climate change is particularly alarming in the context of recent wildfires in the US, which in California in 2020 alone caused insured losses estimated at $8 billion. 

On biodiversity, no US or international insurers have set any nature-related targets, such as those relating to deforestation, hazardous waste or water use across their portfolio. 

On human rights, no US or Canadian insurer - compared with 18% of international competitors - has a policy to exclude investment in companies that are knowingly in breach of human and labor rights. ShareAction claims the majority of the insurance industry “is willing to turn a blind eye to direct and deliberate corporate human and labor rights violations”. 

EU insurers earned the best marks in the survey, with ShareAction arguing said the transatlantic divide was “likely attributable to the strong regulatory signals on sustainable finance within Europe”.
 

Image Credit | iStock
Also filed in:
News

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ