Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2020
General Features

Sharpe decision

Open-access content Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Authors
Ziling Jiang

Ziling Jiang explains how insurers can use the ‘Solvency Sharpe ratio’ to help make good investment decisions

web_p36-37_darts_iStock-1220045358.png

Insurance companies often find it difficult to judge the relative ‘usefulness’ of a proposed new investment. ‘Risk-adjusted return’ is probably the most familiar concept, but is often calculated from an asset-only perspective. Another one is the ‘return on regulatory capital’, but it tends to punish equities and promote an artificially high solvency ratio at the expense of long-term growth.

The biggest players in the industry have built sophisticated internal models intended to be more appropriate to the company’s own risk return profile. However, the investment team might feel unsure how such guidance is determined, or whether it is completely reasonable.

Solvency Sharpe ratio

The Sharpe ratio was developed by the Nobel laureate William F Sharpe and is used to help investors understand the return on an investment compared to its risk. The ratio is the average asset growth rate in excess of the funding (short-term borrowing) rate per unit of investment volatility.

To help insurers achieve efficient and consistent investment decision-making, I propose a new concept called the ‘Solvency Sharpe ratio’ (SSR). The SSR is the average asset growth rate in excess of the liability discount rate per unit of solvency risk. The formula is constructed similarly to the conventional Sharpe ratio formula, but everything is adapted to a whole-balance-sheet perspective.

The SSR can be calculated using a back-test, for comparing an insurance company’s own performance between different time periods or for comparing different insurers. Alternatively, it can be calculated on a forward-looking basis using stochastic simulations, to help make strategic asset allocation or other important decisions. Shareholder dividends must be added back so as to account for the true extent of asset growth.

For companies with thin capital, a stochastic simulation might produce a number of insolvency scenarios, rendering the denominator incalculable. In such cases, we can apply an insolvency penalty factor to the whole formula. One way of calculating a penalty factor is Exp(0 – percentage of insolvency cases).

The numerator is what the investment team is most interested in; the denominator is what the capital team and the regulator care about. Investment people love the Sharpe ratio and actuaries love the Solvency ratio. The SSR provides the best of both worlds. The concept also encourages the two sides to work more closely together.  

Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the asset allocation and efficient frontier respectively of an average UK insurer. At each point along the efficient frontier, 1,000 scenarios were generated for solvency ratio development over 10 years. The median SSR across all the scenarios is taken as the representative value at that point.

Figure 1

Figure 2 highlights two red points – the two local maxima of the SSR. The lower red point consistently turned out to be the ‘minimum risk’ point of the entire efficient frontier. This was a pleasant surprise, since we only knew that the investment volatility was minimised, but it turned out that the SSR would also ‘agree with’ the relatively high efficiency of this ‘minimum risk’ point.  

Figure 2

The higher red point is of more interest, having a higher target investment return of 3.6%. The SSR maximises here not through minimisation of risk, but due to a new optimised balance of risk and return, which should be quite interesting to any asset allocator wishing to reach higher than the ‘minimum risk’ plan.

A possible explanation for the existence of this additional point is that the SSR calculation takes into account the cumulative growth of a higher-risk plan, providing a stronger buffer to the downside as time passes compared to the minimum-risk plan. Such a time-evolving cumulative benefit is not in the efficient frontier calculation, because the efficient frontier is based on a static correlation matrix of asset class returns.

The balance sheet modelled was assumed to have had a 300% solvency ratio to start with, providing adequate capital headroom for accommodating different asset allocations, some of which contained capital-heavy growth assets. If we had assumed that the company was thin on capital, the insolvency penalty factor would have come into play and the second point would have moved down quite a bit.

Before and after COVID-19

In Figure 3, the orange points are the optimal points as of September 2019; the grey points are the optimal points as of May 2020. The optimal allocation strategies appear to have ‘stretched out’ over time, suggesting that insurers should buy more risky assets after COVID-19. However, European insurers are more restricted than their global peers in terms of investment freedom. Thanks to less penalising capital charges, insurers across the US and Asia-Pacific regions can take advantage of spread widening and market dislocation opportunities to increase exposure to more alternative fixed income and return-seeking assets.

Figure 3

With the SSR you no longer have to ‘guess’ which point is the best along the efficient frontier. Before 2008, people generally believed that equities and bonds should demonstrate a negative correlation. In 2013, no one anticipated prolonged negative interest rates. At the end of 2019, we did not imagine the onset of COVID-19, and its potentially long-lasting consequences.

Surprises are becoming the norm. A responsive and robust metric such as the SSR could be useful for building a sound strategic asset allocation, especially when onboarding an unfamiliar alternative investment strategy.

Ziling Jiang is head of insurance analytics EMEA at Neuberger Berman

Image credit | iStock
Actuary Banner september5 (1).png
This article appeared in our September 2020 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

Investing in the future

Investing in the future

Chris Lewin presents alternative scenarios for development of UK infrastructure by the year 2050
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
Rethink reporting

Rethink reporting

Amerjit Grewal and Matthew Byrne suggest improvements to the current reporting techniques used by reserving actuaries
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
Prepare for Impact from COVID-19

Prepare for Impact from COVID-19

James Sharpe, Nicole Austin and Andrew Rowe of the Extreme Events Working Party consider the economic outcomes that COVID-19 could cause for insurers
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
Imperfect numbers under IFRS 17

Imperfect numbers under IFRS 17

Kunj Behari Maheshwari and Brian Ring discuss considerations for excluding factors that do not impact insurance cashflows but may influence observable prices in emerging market discount rates
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
web_p40_00020558-©Ikon-.png

Risk: a clean sheet

Julian Kirkman-Page reflects on how risk managers can offer value to their businesses in a volatile era
Wednesday 5th August 2020
Open-access content
Inflated worth: The implications of planned RPI reforms

Inflated worth: The implications of planned RPI reforms

Jonathan Camfield looks at the planned RPI reforms’ potential implications for bond markets, pension schemes and actuarial work
Wednesday 5th August 2020
Open-access content

Latest from Investment

KV

Liability-driven investments: new landscape

What now for liability-driven investments, after last year’s crash in the market? Pensions experts Rakesh Girdharlal and Moiz Khan say it should lead to a more balanced approach
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
cj

Natural capital investing

Chris Howells and Andrew Dreaneen discuss how today’s investments in natural capital profit portfolios as well as the planet and humanity
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
t

Options open on making portfolios more climate-friendly

Michael Sher sets out the option savailable to investors who are looking to improve their portfolios’ climate credentials
Wednesday 2nd November 2022
Open-access content

Latest from General Insurance

td

Brain power

The latest microchips mimic cerebral function. Smaller, faster and more efficient than their predecessors, they have the potential to save lives and help insurers, argues Amarnath Suggu
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
bl

'Takaful' models of Islamic insurance

Ethical, varied and a growing market – ‘takaful’ Islamic insurance is worth knowing about, wherever you’re from and whatever your beliefs, says Ali Asghar Bhuriwala
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
il

When 'human' isn't female

It was only last year that the first anatomically correct female crash test dummy was created. With so much data still based on the male perspective, are we truly meeting all consumer needs? Adél Drew discusses her thoughts, based on the book Invisible Women by Caroline Criado Perez
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content

Latest from General Features

yguk

Is anybody out there?

There’s no point speaking if no one hears you. Effective communication starts with silence – this is the understated art of listening, says Tan Suee Chieh
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
ers

By halves

Reducing the pensions gap between men and women is a work in progress – and there’s still a long way to go, with women retiring on 50% less than men, says Alexandra Miles
Thursday 2nd March 2023
Open-access content
web_Question-mark-lightbulbs_credit_iStock-1348235111.png

Figuring it out

Psychologist Wendy Johnson recalls how qualifying as an actuary and running her own consultancy in the US allowed her to overcome shyness and gave her essential skills for life
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content

Latest from Ziling Jiang

tfd

A matter of adjustment

Private assets will continue to shine even under the Treasury’s proposed changes to the Solvency II matching adjustment, says Ziling Jiang
Wednesday 2nd November 2022
Open-access content
web_p16-17_Full-tilt_CREDIT_GettyImages-1157561113.jpg

Full tilt: ESG’s place in strategic asset allocation

Ziling Jiang and Cyril Bosse-Platiere explain how institutional investors can develop strategic asset allocations using asset classes adjusted to provide higher ESG ratings
Wednesday 3rd November 2021
Open-access content

Latest from September 2020

web_p30-31_FRC-Shanghai-factories--Istock--155234763.png

Putting risk into perspective

Simon Wasserman and Matthew Myring-McCullagh explain the importance of the Joint Forum on Actuarial Regulation’s Risk Perspective publication
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
Worth the operational risk

Worth the operational risk

Nicole Pang looks at emerging trends in operational risk modelling, and how firms are improving their operational risk models
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
web_p38-39_learning_iStock-1144034871-[Converted].png

New Lessons in Learning - Part 2

Moving between industry and academia can provide great personal insight, as the second part in our series shows
Wednesday 2nd September 2020
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Leading Insurer/Asset Manager – Pricing Actuary (Mortgages)

London (Greater)
Competitive
Reference
148750

Senior Consultant - Risk Settlement - Any UK Location - Up to £100,000 plus bonus

London / Manchester / Edinburgh / Remote
Up to £100,000 + Bonus
Reference
148832

Finance Transformation Actuarial student/Qualified Actuary

London (Central)
£50,000 - £75,000 depending on experience
Reference
148830
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ