Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2020
Students

Mortality improvement assumptions: a hot topic

Open-access content Thursday 4th June 2020

Jack Carmichael explores recent advancements in setting mortality improvement assumptions

web-student_june20-©_scarsbrook.jpg

Setting mortality assumptions is a key part of the valuation of a life insurance portfolio or pension scheme. Although it may seem morbid, setting mortality assumptions is an area where I feel I can really apply the actuarial examination knowledge and leave the office feeling intellectually challenged.

A mortality assumption is typically set in two parts: 1) the probability of death today, and 2) how that probability will change in future. The second point – future improvements in mortality – has recently seen a high amount of activity and discussion due to three events: the significant fall in mortality improvements in the general population since 2011; an increased focus on evidence that mortality improvements have differed depending on socio-economic status; and COVID-19.

The post-2011 decline in improvements has been a hot topic for good reason. If mortality improvements had continued at the same average rate from 2011 to the present as they did from 2000 to 2011, the age standardised rate of mortality (a weighted average mortality rate that removes the impact of an ageing population) between the ages of 65 and 100 would now be around 15% lower than it currently is. The result of this has been a fall in projected mortality improvements produced by models based on extrapolating from historical trends.

In 2019 we saw the highest mortality improvement since 2009, so the immediate question is whether this marks the end of the post-2011 slowdown. Historical annual mortality improvements, even for the relatively large population of England and Wales, can be extremely volatile, and so we will not know whether this is the case for several years.

The second development is the increased acknowledgement that future longevity improvements appear to be linked to socio-economic status. It has been known for a while that mortality rates are lower for individuals living in less deprived areas in England and Wales, but research has also shown that these rates have been improving faster than rates in more deprived areas. This led to the Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) adding the new initial addition to mortality improvements parameter into CMI_2018. Interestingly, though, research published by the CMI in Working Paper 127 shows that all socio-economic groups have been affected by the post-2011 slowdown in improvements.

However, measuring the differences in improvements between populations can be difficult, as to do so reliably requires significantly more data compared to measuring differences in mortality rates. Issues are further compounded by a lack of research into the key socio-economic factors that are causing these differences, although researchers have started to look at breaking down the Index of Multiple Deprivation (the government’s measure of socio-economic status) into its constituent parts to better understand the underlying causes of differences in improvements.

While historical data is a useful tool, it is also helpful to consider what might happen in the future. The current major issue is the COVID-19 pandemic. If this leads to an increased number of deaths among pensioners and policyholders, it will increase life insurance payments and decrease pension and annuity payments. There would also be indirect effects; for example, mortality tables or projections models that use 2020 mortality data may predict lower life expectancies, lower economic growth leading to lower healthcare spending, and potentially increased frailty among individuals who catch and survive the disease.

On the other hand, deaths in 2020 could actually be lower than in a ‘normal’ year if self-isolation and containment causes a reduction in influenza deaths that more than offsets COVID-19 deaths. However, this outcome seems very unlikely, given the number of deaths currently expected to occur as a result of COVID-19.

Given current uncertainty – specifically around the effectiveness of the government’s COVID-19 strategy – it is 
too early to say what the eventual impact will be. Some areas, such as increased frailty, may never be fully understood.

Although further technical advances may be made in the coming years, it is likely that COVID-19 will dominate mortality improvement discussions for at least the next few years. It may also be that the true underlying cause of the post-2011 slowdown is never fully understood, although ‘regime shifts’ such as this are likely to occur again in the future. I have no doubt that mortality improvements will remain a fast-paced and challenging area for the profession. 

Jack Carmichael is guest student editor

Picture Credit | Scarsbrook
image.jpeg
This article appeared in our June 2020 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

_Ikon-00024147-v2.jpg

Pass it on

The IAA’s Mortality Working Group provides a valuable forum for sharing information on mortality research around the world, says Brian Ridsdale
Thursday 7th May 2020
Open-access content
web-UNP-Redactive-39939-John-Taylor-Glasgow.007.jpg

Wellbeing: behind the curtain

During what is proving to be a difficult and stressful time for many John Taylor reflects on his own mental health experiences, and the value of reaching out
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content
student_may20_©-Simon-scarsbrook.jpg

Opportunity or loss?

Refilwe Modise asks whether pensions or property makes the better investment choice
Thursday 7th May 2020
Open-access content
web-p20-22-©IKON--00024562-1n-copy.jpg

Supervision reforms in the frame

Pau Ling Yap and Paolo Cadoni on the recently agreed reforms that aim to improve supervision of internationally active insurance groups
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content
web-p19-Illustration-.jpg

Sharing the load in pension provision

Simon Eagle looks at developments in the provision of collective defined contribution pensions in the UK
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content
people

June: People & Society News

An update for June on what our society has been up to...
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content

Latest from Students

hjb

Nudge, nudge

How behavioural science can shake up insurance. Ciara Izuchukwu explains
Wednesday 1st March 2023
Open-access content
pji

Today's property market: the winners and losers

Kinjal Dalal on the winners and losers in the current UK property market
Wednesday 1st February 2023
Open-access content
uh

The road to understanding

Vrishti Goel examines how data analytics could provide more personalised insurance products, for example within the motor insurance industry
Wednesday 30th November 2022
Open-access content

Latest from June 2020

web-p29-29-Web-©-Ikon-00024455-1.jpg

Stochastic claims reserving models: taking the one-year view

Stochastic claims reserving models are not widely understood – but Robert Scarth wants to change this. Here, he discusses models for one-year risk
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content
web-p24-26-main-pic---.jpg

Insurance pricing: the proxy problem

If we want to avoid discrimination in insurance pricing, we need to be able to take protected characteristics into account, say Mathias Lindholm, Ronald Richman, Andreas Tsanakas and Mario Wüthrich
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content
web-p21-Brian-Hey-Prize--Trophies-and-medal-prices--Ikon---00010059.jpg

Brian Hey: eyes on the prize

Joseph Lo looks back on some past winners of the Brian Hey Prize
Thursday 4th June 2020
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Leading Insurer/Asset Manager – Pricing Actuary (Mortgages)

London (Greater)
Competitive
Reference
148750

Senior Consultant - Risk Settlement - Any UK Location - Up to £100,000 plus bonus

London / Manchester / Edinburgh / Remote
Up to £100,000 + Bonus
Reference
148832

Finance Transformation Actuarial student/Qualified Actuary

London (Central)
£50,000 - £75,000 depending on experience
Reference
148830
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ