Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Sections
  • General Features

Facts and circumstances: science or art?

Open-access content Tuesday 14th April 2020 — updated 9.44pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020
Authors
ALICE BOREMAN

How do we define facts and circumstances when assessing onerous contracts under IFRS 17? The IFRS 17 for GI Working Party considers the issue

web_p31_robot-art_ikon_00012315.png

One of the key objectives of IFRS 17 is to improve the transparency and comparability of financial statements across industries and countries. To achieve this, profitable groups of contracts and so-called onerous groups of contracts must be disclosed separately. An insurance contract is deemed to be onerous at the date of initial recognition if the fulfilment cashflows (ie premiums in, less all relevant claims, and expenses, less risk adjustments) are a net outflow in relation to the contract. Under IFRS 17, the expected loss from onerous groups of contracts cannot be offset by gains from profitable contracts.

The general measurement model requires the modelling of all contract fulfilment cashflows, including those related to the future coverage; this will determine whether groups of contracts are onerous. However, under the simplified Premium Allocation Approach (PAA), there is no expectation that fulfilment cashflows relating to future coverage be modelled. As a result, it is assumed that no contracts in the portfolio are onerous unless facts and circumstances indicate otherwise. If facts and circumstances indicate that a group of contracts may be onerous, an entity is required to assess onerousness and immediately recognise a loss component (if calculated to be non-zero) in the statement of financial performance.

As such, organisations using the PAA need to operationalise a process that balances simplicity, ease of explanation and accuracy in identifying potentially onerous contracts. This process should define facts and circumstances, as well as triggers for when a loss component calculation is required.  

Facts and circumstances

Facts and circumstances are required to provide a forward-looking view of expected profitability in the remaining coverage. The standard does not explicitly define what constitutes facts and circumstances; it does imply that the assessment of facts and circumstances should not necessarily involve creating new information but instead consider the way performance is currently analysed within the business.

This suggests facts and circumstances would likely arise from information included in internal management information, business planning, pricing information, regulatory change or any other technical analysis that may indicate changes in the expected profitability within the future coverage of contracts. When choosing the information used to assess facts and circumstances, consider the level of granularity required and the feasibility of gathering information in an efficient way. 

Calculating a loss component

IFRS 17 would suggest that it is necessary to support the facts and circumstances assessment under the PAA on both new and existing groups of contracts at each valuation period. In practice, a wide range of approaches could be used to identify when a loss component calculation is required – from simple adjustments to existing internal management measures, to full IFRS 17 fulfilment cashflow calculations.

On one end of the scale, existing internal management measures can be leveraged and combined with IFRS 17 concepts to obtain a view of expected profitability. This could be based on combined ratios compared against pre-determined thresholds. These thresholds should be calibrated to reflect IFRS 17 concepts such as discounting and risk adjustment. If this approach indicates a loss component is required, additional calculations may be required to quantify the loss component. An alternative approach could be to design a simplified IFRS 17 model to assess groups of contracts for expected profitability, where this can also be used to quantify the loss component.

The art is to use existing information adjusted for IFRS 17 concepts and find a balance between ease of explanation and accuracy. Also consider the ability to override results produced by the above suggested methods using expert judgment from relevant stakeholders. This would provide a qualitative assessment of facts and circumstances, but can be prone to bias.

In any case, this process will need to be supported by appropriate governance, and leverage existing processes where possible. This involves a wider range of stakeholders and results in disclosing the existence of loss-making business to users – so a closer link between different functions across the business will be key. The stakeholders involved will inevitably influence how this process is defined within an organisation. 

Alice Boreman is chair of the IFRS 17 for GI Working Party

Also filed in
General Features
Topics
General Insurance
Professional

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pensions Actuarial Analyst

London, Midlands, Scotland
£Market Competitive
Reference
143788

Senior Manager/Director level roles - Life insurance

Stirling
Generous salary with excellent bonus and benefits
Reference
143787

Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£60-90K depending on experience
Reference
143786
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ